2015
DOI: 10.1108/ijlls-01-2015-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social semiotic approach to identifying critical aspects

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a social semiotic approach to analysing objects of learning in terms of their critical aspects. Design/methodology/approach – The design for this paper focuses on how the semiotic resources – including language, equations, and diagrams – that are commonly used in physics teaching realise the critical aspects of a common physics object of learning. A social semiotic approach to the analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When participants discussed writing in the context of their own scholarship and disciplines, writing almost always referred to academic publishing and grant proposal writing. The inclusion of so many forms of writing reveal a broad and liberal definition of writing and aligns with our definition of writing as any text resulting from a meaning‐making task (Fredlund et al., ; Norris & Phillips, ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When participants discussed writing in the context of their own scholarship and disciplines, writing almost always referred to academic publishing and grant proposal writing. The inclusion of so many forms of writing reveal a broad and liberal definition of writing and aligns with our definition of writing as any text resulting from a meaning‐making task (Fredlund et al., ; Norris & Phillips, ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Airey and Linder (, ) and Fredlund, Linder, and Airey () contend that writing is one mode of representation within disciplinary discourse, where disciplinary discourse is multimodal and specific sets of modes of representation are needed to access specific disciplinary ways of knowing (Airey & Linder, , ). This literacy perspective suggests that while developing discursive fluency is necessary, it is not sufficient for learning disciplinary knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, is also only a representation of the "real" object. This kind of representation gets built on chains of processes and representations that have been coordinated by people, often over a long time period [128]. Such representations have intended meanings, created by someone with a particular purpose, and made up by an enormous number of disciplinary affordances [37].…”
Section: B Reading the Sky-highlighting Differences Between Expert Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical aspects are critical only in relation to the learners. I cannot find this relational character of critical aspects, in Fredlund et al (2015).…”
Section: The Role Of Theory For Generating Knowledge Of What Is To Bementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This could indeed be done with different purposes. Although their paper is not based on a lesson or learning study, Fredlund, Linder and Airey (2015) illustrates how social semiotic theories (Halliday, 1978) can be applied when analyzing texts (in a broad sense) in a physics text book to identify critical aspects and the object of learning. In a very close analysis of a canonical text about light refraction, they explore the similarity between variation theory and a social semiotic approach to meaning-making, and propose a new approach to identifying critical aspects of objects of learning.…”
Section: The Role Of Theory For Generating Knowledge Of What Is To Bementioning
confidence: 99%