A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OFJIHAD

Abstract

Since many offensive and defensive wars or acts of terrorism, such as the atrocities of 11 September in the United States and the July 2005 bombings in London, are committed under the banner of Islam and the duty of jihad, it is important to shed some light upon the Islamic laws of war in general, and the controversial concept of jihad in particular. This article traces the origins of, and rationale for, the use of force within the Islamic tradition, and assesses the meaning and evolution of the contentious concept of jihad within its historical context. Following an analysis of the opposing doctrinal views on the potential implications of jihad, the study argues that the concept of jihad should not be interpreted literally, but be adjusted in accordance with new historical and international conditions, and conducted by peaceful means, rather than by the sword.

The Roots of Indonesia's Resilience Against Violent Extremism

“…ey justify the use of violence against both their own governments and Western targets. For further discussion on the meaning of jihad see: (Bakircioglu 2010;Gerges 2005;Kepel 2002;Knapp 2003;Schmid 2014;Sedgwick 2015;Wiktorowicz 2005). 2.…”

Teaching Jihad: Developing Religious Literacy through Graphic Novels

“…Greater jihad can be subdivided into jihad against oneself (al-nafs), jihad against Satan (ash-Shaytan), jihad for education (al-tarbiyah), and jihad in the proselytizing of Islam (al-da'awa), along with other recognized subdivisions (Kabbani 2010). Jihad al-nafs means to struggle against one's lower self or base instincts, in order to become a better Muslim (Bakircioglu 2010). This internal struggle for spiritual growth requires Muslims to resist arrogance, anger, temptation, pride, greed, jealousy, lust, stinginess, and malice (Al-Ghazali 1995; Fatoohi 2009).…”