A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes

Abstract

Both economists and sociologists have documented the association between gender and career outcomes. Men are more likely than women to participate in the labor force, and men average more hours of paid labor per week and more weeks per year. Women and men tend to hold different occupations and to work in different industries, firms and jobs. Furthermore, men outearn women, hold more complex jobs and are more likely to supervise workers of the other sex and to dominate the top positions in their organization.The challenge for both disciplines lies not in showing that gender is linked to employment outcomes, but in explaining the associations. Economists have sought explanations in the characteristics and preferences of individual workers or employers. Some have attributed the associations between workers' sex and their career outcomes to sex differences in training and experience, career commitment or competing demands on time and energy. Others focus on employers' preferences for workers of one sex over the other ("taste discrimination") or on employers' beliefs that workers of one sex or the other are more costly or less profitable to employ ("statistical discrimination").The sociological approach differs from that of economists in recognizing sex segregation as a causal mechanism that gives rise to other differences between women's and men's careers. This emphasis on segregation reflects sociologists' interest in the ramifications of societal-level systems of differentiation and stratification. It stems also from the discipline's concern with the impact of people's location in social structures on a variety of life outcomes. By concentrating men and women in different jobs, segregation exposes them to more or less similar employment y Barbara F. Reskin is S. Frank Miyamoto Professor of Sociology,

What Do We Know About The Patterns and Determinants of Female Entrepreneurship Across Countries?

“…Within this context, a post-institutional approach based on insights from economics and organization theory seems promising (Reskin and Bielby, 2005), as well as economic approaches that integrate tools and methods from anthropology and ethnography (Chamlee-Wright, 1997;Minniti, 2010).…”

Job Insecurity and Its Consequences: Investigating Moderators, Mediators and Gender

“…More recent statistics show that the overall numbers of female employees in leadership positions have increased; in 2001 approximately one fourth of the leadership positions were held by women whereas in 2009 it is one third of all leadership positions (SCB, 2010). Additional structural differences that are associated with the positions men and women work in are, for example, differences in career prospective, salary, and bonuses (Arai, Nekby, & Skogman Thoursie, 2004;Birkelund, 1992;Kilbourne, England, Farkas, Beron, & Weir, 1994;Petersen & Morgan, 2008;Reskin & Bielby, 2005).…”

Missing Links: Referrer Behavior and Job Segregation

“…Organizations screen the set of job applicants to determine which of those applicants are offered the job. This screening process is often seen as the main opportunity and locus for organizations to contribute to job segregation through biased inputs (Petersen and Saporta 2004;Reskin and Bielby 2005). Firms also influence the demographic composition of their job applicants through recruitment practices.…”

“…It is a widely researched labor market phenomenon with many job and organization specific bias estimates presented in the literature, albeit often with the caveat that males and females are "observationally equivalent." 15 Sex bias in job screening has been suggested to be the primary opportunity and mechanism through which a firm may contribute to job sex segregation (Kauffman 2002;Petersen, Saporta and Seidel 2001;Reskin and Bielby 2005).…”