Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2806416.2806478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Soft Computing Approach for Learning to Aggregate Rankings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the most widespread score-based methods are: CombMAX, CombMIN, CombSUM, Com-bANZ, CombMNZ). In turn, BordaCount, Median Rank Aggregation (MRA) and Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) are popular order-based methods [Vargas Muñoz et al 2015]. However, although these algorithms have been used in many applications, they do not consider diversification explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most widespread score-based methods are: CombMAX, CombMIN, CombSUM, Com-bANZ, CombMNZ). In turn, BordaCount, Median Rank Aggregation (MRA) and Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) are popular order-based methods [Vargas Muñoz et al 2015]. However, although these algorithms have been used in many applications, they do not consider diversification explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No primeiro grupo, a função de agregação leva como entrada as informações de pontuação dos objetos de cada lista. Na segunda, apenas a ordem relativa entre os documentos é considerada (Muñoz et al , 2015). Dentre as técnicas baseadas em escores, pode-se destacar a família Comb* (Shaw & Fox, 1994) (e.g., CombMIN, CombMAX, CombSUM, CombMED, CombMNZ e CombANZ).…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…In the recent years, different methods have been proposed with the intent of fusing results from distinct visual features [10]- [13]. Most of them still require labels or user intervention to achieve effective results, and only few works have addressed aspects of selection without labeled data [14]- [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%