2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2018.8491581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Soft Davies-Bouldin Separation Measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we defined three types of metrics to assess the clustering performance. (1) Silhouette Coefficient (SC) (Dinh et al, 2019); (2) Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI) (Łukasik et al, 2016); (3) Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI) (Vergani and Binaghi, 2018).…”
Section: Clustering Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we defined three types of metrics to assess the clustering performance. (1) Silhouette Coefficient (SC) (Dinh et al, 2019); (2) Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI) (Łukasik et al, 2016); (3) Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI) (Vergani and Binaghi, 2018).…”
Section: Clustering Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, internal validation provides a good score to the algorithms that produce high similarity within a cluster and low similarity between clusters. Davies Bouldin Index [36], Dunn Index [37] and Silhouette Index [38] are the popular methods for internal validation measure. There are also some new clustering validation indices proposed such as clustering validation index based on nearest neighbors (CVVN index) [39], Local Cores-based Cluster Validity (LCCV index) [40] and Absolute Cluster Validity index [41].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of VAT and topic models are used in our proposed framework (hence, they called as VNMF, VLDA, VLSI, and VPLSI) and experimented with Euclidean, cosine based and multiviewpoint cosine based metrics. Evaluation of proposed techniques are measured with five external validity indexes, namely, clustering accuracy (CA) [41], normalized mutual information (NMI) [42], precision (P), recall (R) and F-Score (F) [43], [44] and seven internal validity indexes viz., Davies-Bouldin index (DB) [55], [56], [60], Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI) [55], [56], Silhouette Index (SI) [55], [56], Xie-Beni Index (XI) [57], Partition Coefficient (PC) [59], Partition Entropy Index (PEI) [57], [58], and Separation Measure (SM) [60]. Health tweets are assigned to topic clusters which are maintained the highest similarity with the topic clusters to improve the value of CA.…”
Section: Performance Measures Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%