2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04792-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A soft elastomer alternative to polypropylene for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 The PDMS mesh showed a better tissue incorporation and less reduction in vaginal muscle contractility compared with polypropylene. 40 However, PDMS is a non-degradable heavyweight polymer, which means that the long-term biocompatibility of this mesh is still unknown. The study of degradable polyurethane loaded with antibiotics manufactured by fused deposition modelling (FDM) is another promising option.…”
Section: Current Practicementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…40 The PDMS mesh showed a better tissue incorporation and less reduction in vaginal muscle contractility compared with polypropylene. 40 However, PDMS is a non-degradable heavyweight polymer, which means that the long-term biocompatibility of this mesh is still unknown. The study of degradable polyurethane loaded with antibiotics manufactured by fused deposition modelling (FDM) is another promising option.…”
Section: Current Practicementioning
confidence: 94%
“…44 3D-printed PDMS mesh was implanted in New Zealand rabbits for 12 weeks. 40 The PDMS mesh showed a better tissue incorporation and less reduction in vaginal muscle contractility compared with polypropylene. 40 However, PDMS is a nondegradable heavyweight polymer, which means that the long-term biocompatibility of this mesh is still unknown.…”
Section: A Possible Materials Solutionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porous polymer (polypropylene) meshes, modeled after those used in hernia surgeries, have been rightfully scrutinized for the high rate of deleterious side effects when used in transvaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. 53 Pore size and overall porosity are critical to patient outcomes, and current research has examined both tissue-derived mesh substitutes and novel mesh designsboth in material and in pore geometry-explicitly addressing the clinical problems that arose with the now-recalled polypropylene products. 30,31 An example is shown in Figure 4d, in which an elastomeric material is used to print an auxetic mesh structure-one that widens when elongated instead of narrowing.…”
Section: Pelvic Floor Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 An example is shown in Figure 4d, in which an elastomeric material is used to print an auxetic mesh structure-one that widens when elongated instead of narrowing. 53 Until new mesh designs, mesh materials, and surgical BiOMATEriALS SciEncE And EnGinEErinG TO AddrESS UnMET nEEdS in wOMEn'S hEALTh approaches are validated, elastomeric intravaginal (removable) pessaries remain an alternative to surgery. 54…”
Section: Pelvic Floor Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%