2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.267.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Software Project Management Method Based on Trust and Knowledge Sharing

Abstract: Trust is the most important issue to create relationship making value in knowledge sharing. Knowledge itself cannot lead to a success, as knowledge sharing or flow of knowledge is of prime importance in an organization. Knowledge sharing depends on trust between trusted and trustee members in specific knowledge context and specific time slot. Trust level between members has a high impact on software project performance. The future work could include defining a role and measurement of trust and knowledge sharin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although expenditure on software development increases by 200% each decade, productivity of software system engineers only increases by 35% (Leon, 2004). Approximately 75% of the total life cycle cost for a given system is related to system maintenance and operation (Jorgensen and Molokken-Ostvold, 2006;Gilb, 2006;Standish Group, 2014a;Standish Group, 2014b;Cerpa and Verner, 2009;Linberg, 1999;Chen and Huang, 2009;Tang and Huang, 2011). Technical debt has been recognized as a critical factor that leads to the escalating maintenance cost of software systems.…”
Section: Background: Current State Of Software System Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although expenditure on software development increases by 200% each decade, productivity of software system engineers only increases by 35% (Leon, 2004). Approximately 75% of the total life cycle cost for a given system is related to system maintenance and operation (Jorgensen and Molokken-Ostvold, 2006;Gilb, 2006;Standish Group, 2014a;Standish Group, 2014b;Cerpa and Verner, 2009;Linberg, 1999;Chen and Huang, 2009;Tang and Huang, 2011). Technical debt has been recognized as a critical factor that leads to the escalating maintenance cost of software systems.…”
Section: Background: Current State Of Software System Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pese a los avances en Ingeniería del Software, se reportan cientos de millones de dólares en pérdidas en proyectos de software (Charette, 2005). La tasa de fracasos está entre el 66% (Cox, Niazi, & Verner, 2009) y el 90% compuesto por 50% de fallas totales y 40% de parciales (Tang & Huang, 2011). Aunque entre 1994 y 2008 la tasa de éxito en proyectos de software ha pasado del 16% al 32%, la de fracaso ha bajado de 34% a 21%, y la de rescate de proyectos con altos sobrecostos o con disminución de expectativas ha bajado del 53% al 44%, estas cifras todavía indican un 65% de proyectos con fallas parciales o totales (Nasir & Sahibuddin, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified