2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/24/1/015002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sol–gel method for growing superconducting MgB2films

Abstract: In this paper we report a new sol–gel method for the fabrication of MgB2 films. Polycrystalline MgB2 films were prepared by spin-coating a precursor solution of Mg(BH4)2 diethyl ether on (001)Al2O3 substrates followed with annealing in Mg vapor. In comparison with the MgB2 films grown by other techniques, our films show medium qualities including a superconducting transition temperature of TC ∼ 37 K, a critical current density of JC(5 K, 0 T) ∼ 5 × 106 A cm − 2, and a critical field of HC2(0) ∼ 19 T. Such a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Near zero applied field, it is shown that the J c is in the range 1.2 − 2.6 × 10 6 A cm −2 at temperatures 5-25 K, with the value 1.7 × 10 6 A cm −2 at 5 K-10 K lower than 2.6 × 10 6 A cm −2 at 15 K because of the suppression from flux jumps at 5-10 K as exemplified in the inset of figure 10(a) [52]. We note that these J c values are lower than the superior values of above 10 7 A cm −2 for high-quality epitaxial MgB 2 thin films [36,67], but comparable to both typical values for epitaxial MgB 2 films [68] and that reported on high-quality polycrystalline MgB 2 planar films [33,36,69]. According to previous simulations [18,19,26], these values of J c would be promising for potential applications in ICF.…”
Section: Superconducting Transitionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Near zero applied field, it is shown that the J c is in the range 1.2 − 2.6 × 10 6 A cm −2 at temperatures 5-25 K, with the value 1.7 × 10 6 A cm −2 at 5 K-10 K lower than 2.6 × 10 6 A cm −2 at 15 K because of the suppression from flux jumps at 5-10 K as exemplified in the inset of figure 10(a) [52]. We note that these J c values are lower than the superior values of above 10 7 A cm −2 for high-quality epitaxial MgB 2 thin films [36,67], but comparable to both typical values for epitaxial MgB 2 films [68] and that reported on high-quality polycrystalline MgB 2 planar films [33,36,69]. According to previous simulations [18,19,26], these values of J c would be promising for potential applications in ICF.…”
Section: Superconducting Transitionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Mg(BH 4 ) 2 •Et 2 O gel was obtained by the chemical reaction in diethyl ether as follows. This detailed fabrication method of Mg(BH 4 ) 2 has been introduced in the previous paper [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal driving force for EPD is the charge on the particle and the electrophoretic mobility of the particles in the solvent under the influence of an applied electric field. The EPD technique has been used successfully for thick film of silica (Sarkar and Nicholson, 1996;Besra, 2007), nanosize zeolite membrane (Shan et al, 2004), hydroxyapatite coating on metal substrate for biomedical applications (Zykova et al, 2015), luminescent materials (Meng, 2013), high-temperature superconducting (HT C or HTS) films (Chen et al, 2011), gas diffusion electrodes and sensors (Bodansky and Latner, 1972), multi-layer composites (Boccaccini et al, 2010), glass and ceramic matrix composites by infiltration of ceramic particles onto fibre fabrics (Boccaccini and Trusty, 1998), oxide nanorods (Cao, 2004), carbon nanotube film (Chen et al, 2012), functionally graded ceramics (Sarkar and Nicholson, 1996), layered ceramics (Yang et al, 2011), superconductors, piezoelectric materials (Besra, 2007, etc. Indeed, the only intrinsic disadvantages of EPD, compared with other colloidal processes (e.g.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%