2017
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201601547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sol–Gel Ruthenium–Niobium–Silicon Mixed‐Oxide Bifunctional Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Levulinic Acid in the Aqueous Phase

Abstract: A mixed-oxide nanomaterial with composition (RuO2)0.038(Nb2O5)0.024(SiO2)0.938 was prepared by a one-pot sol–gel route. The synthesis was entirely performed at room temperature, by using easy-to-handle precursors and avoiding the employment of any toxic and/or polluting reactant. One of the samples was synthesised in the presence of a non-ionic surfactant acting as both pore directing agent and metal complexing agent, obtaining a high-specific-surface-area material characterized by a very good dispersion of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other platform building blocks, levulinic acid has attracted much more attention in recent years. Mainstream efforts have primarily focused on bimetallic catalysts and metal‐solid acid hybridized nanocatalysts . The main advantage of using bimetallic catalysts is to alter the binding energy of carboxylic groups on metal surface, while for hybrid catalyst systems, the presence of acidic promoters often lowers activation barriers for H 2 and C=O bond, although unfavorable reconstruction Bronsted acidic sites ( e. g ., Al 3+ leaching) still remains a serious issue.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other platform building blocks, levulinic acid has attracted much more attention in recent years. Mainstream efforts have primarily focused on bimetallic catalysts and metal‐solid acid hybridized nanocatalysts . The main advantage of using bimetallic catalysts is to alter the binding energy of carboxylic groups on metal surface, while for hybrid catalyst systems, the presence of acidic promoters often lowers activation barriers for H 2 and C=O bond, although unfavorable reconstruction Bronsted acidic sites ( e. g ., Al 3+ leaching) still remains a serious issue.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various materials with high surface areas, such as graphene [30], active carbon [31], carbon nanotubes [32], and mesoporous silica [33,34], have been employed as supports for immobilization of metal NPs in order to obtain homogenous dispersion of the metal NPs in the support. Mesoporous silicas, such as SBA-15, MCM-41, FDU-12, and SBA-16, have been widely used as the supports for the incorporation of the metal NPs due to their large surface areas, pore volumes, and homogenous pore structures [35][36][37][38][39][40]. In particular, 3D cubic mesoporous silicas like FDU-12, SBA-16, and SBA-1 are of great interest as the supports for the entrapment of the metallic NPs, since their interpenetrating mesoporous networks are resilient to pore blocking, and hence the catalysts can provide more active sites for the catalytic reactions [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest total acidity of Cu/γ-Al 2 O 3 was achieved at the Cu loading of 5 wt %, and the agglomeration of Cu particles would result in an obvious decrease in the total catalyst acidity. The optimum catalytic performance with a 98% LA conversion and a 87% GVL selectivity could be given with a 5 wt % Cu loading at 265°C < 10% LA con., < 10% GVL yield 37 RNS-a_h 0.4 g LA, 0.5 g catalyst, 200 g water 70°C, 20 bar H 2 , 1.5 h 45% LA con., 30% GVL yield [31] ( Table 1, entry 22). The effect of temperatures was significant.…”
Section: Metallic Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher temperatures, an angelica lactone (AL) would be formed through the dehydration process of LA, and then be hydrogenated to generate GVL . The Al‐oriented pathway generally prevailed particularly under vapor phase conditions . In fact, the steps of hydrogenation and dehydration always take place in either pathway, and the difference lies only in the sequence of the above two processes under different control conditions.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%