A Soldier-Robot Ad Hoc Network

Luu, Brian B.; O’Brien, Barry; Baran, David; Hardy, Rommie

doi:10.1109/percomw.2007.13

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The circles marked with the symbol (*) correspond to nodes placed on the roof of that position. Table 1 shows the values of RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indication) obtained from each node placed in the home: PAPER MOBILE REMOTE CONTROL FOR HOME AUTOMATION It was observed that wireless communications are continuously attenuated by multiple elements that affect the transmission / reception of information, so that this type of infrastructure cannot be used in all the scenarios [25].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile Remote Control for Home Automation

Meza

Río

Santos

2013

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Domotic: Existing home automation technologies permit persons to control elements of the home using a computer connected to a local network. However, the real challenge is to remotely control objects, permitting users to exercise greater freedom and versatility. This work presents an inexpensive controller device developed for high density constructions typical of many developing countries throughout the world that is designed to remotely control home luminescence, air conditioner and water pumps through mobile devices such as a smart phone or tablet. Results show the packet delivery was acceptable within a range of 15 meters in a concrete, two-story dwelling, thus demonstrating its applicability in small homes in countries which share the same construction features as those of Mexico.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile Remote Control for Home Automation

Meza

Río

Santos

2013

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other trends are the deployment of Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGV) during RSTA missions. Luu et al [41] presented a system based on mobile ad hoc networking that enables a soldier to remotely control a UGV. It was tested in both rural and urban outdoor environments.…”

Section: Militarymentioning

confidence: 99%

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Vandenberghe

Moerman

Demeester

2012

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on the utilization of wireless networking in the robotics domain. Many researchers have already equipped their robots with wireless communication capabilities, stimulated by the observation that multi-robot systems tend to have several advantages over their single-robot counterparts. Typically, this integration of wireless communication is tackled in a quite pragmatic manner, only a few authors presented novel Robotic Ad Hoc Network (RANET) protocols that were designed specifically with robotic use cases in mind. This is in sharp contrast with the domain of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET). This observation is the starting point of this paper. If the results of previous efforts focusing on VANET protocols could be reused in the RANET domain, this could lead to rapid progress in the field of networked robots. To investigate this possibility, this paper provides a thorough overview of the related work in the domain of robotic and vehicular ad hoc networks. Based on this information, an exhaustive list of requirements is defined for both types. It is concluded that the most significant difference lies in the fact that VANET protocols are oriented towards low throughput messaging, while RANET protocols have to support high throughput media streaming as well. Although not always with equal importance, all other defined requirements are valid for both protocols. This leads to the conclusion that cross-fertilization between them is an appealing approach for future RANET research. To support such developments, this paper concludes with the definition of an appropriate working plan.

show abstract

“…This makes them ideal candidate for rescue and emergency operations [1] and other short term networks. The nodes in these networks have limited battery power and bandwidth, and each node needs the assistance of others to get its packets forwarded.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Selfish Node Concentration in MANETs

Gupta¹,

Nagpal²,

Singla³

2011

IJWMN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The communication in Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is multi-hop in nature wherein each node relays data packets of other nodes thereby spending its resources such as battery power, CPU time and memory. In an ideal environment, each node in MANET is supposed to perform this community service truthfully. However this is not the case and existence of selfish nodes is a very common feature in MANETs. A selfish node is one that tries to utilize the network resources for its own profit but is reluctant to spend its own for others. If such behaviour prevails among large number of the nodes in the network, it may eventually lead to disruption of network. This paper studies the impact of selfish nodes concentration on the quality of service in MANETs.

show abstract

A Soldier-Robot Ad Hoc Network

Cited by 21 publications

References 1 publication

Mobile Remote Control for Home Automation

Mobile Remote Control for Home Automation

Adoption of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networking Protocols by Networked Robots

Impact of Selfish Node Concentration in MANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About