A solid composite microbial inoculant for the simultaneous removal of volatile organic sulfide compounds: Preparation, characterization, and its bioaugmentation of a biotrickling filter

Chen, Dong Zhi; Zhao, Xiang; Miao, Xiaoping; Chen, Jing; Ye, Jie Xu; Cheng, Zhuo; Zhang, Shihan; Chen, Jian Meng

doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.079

Cited by 29 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to this analysis and in light of the fact that they are often used interchangeably, we conclude that the terms microbial consortium, synthetic microbial community, microbial cocktail, and synthetic microbiome Del Frari et al, 2019;El Hage et al, 2019;Colpa et al, 2020;Pereira et al, 2020;Dai et al, 2021 Chen et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Rafique et al, 2019;Rékási et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2020;Singh et al, 2020 Synthetic microbial community Shahab et al, 2018;Carrión et al, 2019;Christiaens et al, 2019;Honjo et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020;Krieger et al, 2021 Microbial cocktail Moreira et al, 2017;Qu et al, 2018;Pasaribu et al, 2019;Pires et al, 2019;Tobin et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2020 Synthetic microbiome Venturelli et al, 2018;Timmis et al, 2019;Vandeplassche et al, 2019;Voges et al, 2019;Koskella, 2020;Mabwi et al, 2021 The symbol "+" indicates the presence of the specific key characteristic, while the symbol "-" indicates its absence, in association with each term (refer to the text for the definition of the concepts of each key characteristic).…”

Section: Are Microbial Blend-related Terms Synonyms?mentioning

confidence: 77%

Microbial Blends: Terminology Overview and Introduction of the Neologism “Skopobiota”

Frari

Ferreira

2021

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Are Microbial Blend-related Terms Synonyms?mentioning

confidence: 77%

Microbial Blends: Terminology Overview and Introduction of the Neologism “Skopobiota”

Frari

Ferreira

2021

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Among these, the biological treatment of DMS is a cost-effective process with low secondary pollution and operating cost. Conventional bioreactors, including biofilters, biotrickling filters, and bioscrubbers have been used to remove DMS. , Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) could utilize exoelectrogenic microorganisms as biocatalysts to convert chemical energy of organic pollutants into electrical energy. − The electrode serves as an alternative electron acceptor during the metabolism processes of electrochemical microorganisms to accelerate degradation of organic pollutants. − The MFC has been applied to treat several refractory organic compounds and has significantly enhanced the removal efficiency of compounds such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene), − ethyl acetate, antibiotics (tetracyclines), organophosphate esters (triphenyl phosphate), and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (2,4-dichlorophenol) . Li et al reported that a maximum toluene elimination capacity of the MFC reached 274.5 ± 14.4 g m –3 h –1 , which was equivalent to the removal performance of the biotrickling filter (g m –3 h –1 ) and biofiltration systems (255 g m –3 h –1 ) …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, in the MFC bioanode, the electrons produced through co-metabolism of different organic pollutants are used to generate electricity and further enhance the degradation performance of refractory pollutants . The addition of a co-substrate supports biofilm survival and is used as a nutrient to stimulate microbial activity and induce bacterial proliferation .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-substrate-Assisted Dimethyl Sulfide Degradation and Electricity Generation in a Microbial Fuel Cell

Feng

et al. 2021

Energy Fuels

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) emitted from the petrochemical industry is a typical volatile organic sulfur compound (VOSC) with poor solubility and odorous smell. A microbial fuel cell (MFC) is regarded as an appreciative method for simultaneous DMS degradation and electricity generation. In this work, for the first time, we developed an MFC system for DMS treatment. With an initial concentration of 95 mg L −1 , the DMS removal efficiency at the closed-circuit state was achieved as high as 89.5% within 40 h, which was 1.21 times higher than that at the open-circuit state. The maximum power density and current density were 0.237 mW m −2 and 2.644 mA m −2 , respectively. The dominant electrogenic bacteria in the MFC were Stenotrophomonas, Pseudomonas, and Candidatus Microthrix, and the DMS degraders included Thiobacillus, Truepera, and Candidatus Microthrix. Direct extracellular electron transfer was involved in the bioanode for DMS degradation according to the CV curves. Moreover, to overcome the toxicity of high-concentration DMS on microorganisms and enhance power generation, sodium acetate (NaAc) was added as a co-substrate, resulting in 52.5% increase in DMS degradation activity and a 16.5 times higher maximum output voltage. Overall, these findings may offer basic information for bioelectrochemical degradation of DMS and facilitate the application of MFCs in waste gas treatment.

show abstract

“…Recently, a solid composite microbial inoculant composed of Alcaligenes sp. SY1 and Pseudomonas putida S-1was successfully prepared, which showed improved removal performance and shortened start-up period, when inoculated in biotrickling lters (Chen et al 2018). Nevertheless, the speci c interactions involved in their degradation process were untested, remaining to be elucidated.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is of great importance to shorten the lag phase of DMS degradation in a dual-substrate solution(Chen et al 2018). Adding extra carbon sources can probably enhance the degradation rate of pollutants (Mukherjee and Bordoloi 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Simultaneous biodegradation of dimethyl sulfide and 1-propanethiol by Pseudomonas putida S-1 and Alcaligenes sp. SY1: “Lag” cause, reduction, and kinetics exploration

Tang

Zhang

et al. 2022

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simultaneous biodegradation of malodorous 1-propanethiol (PT) and dimethyl sul de (DMS) inoculated with Pseudomonas putida S-1 and Alcaligenes sp. SY1 were investigated and interactions implicated were explored. Results showed that PT was completely degraded in 33 h, while a lag of 10 h was observed for DMS degradation alone, and the lag even extended to 81 h in the binary mixture. Mechanism analysis found that the lag was mainly attributed to the exposure of DMS degrader (Alcaligenes sp. SY1), rather than PT metabolites and PT degrader. The exposure time and PT concentration in uenced the lag duration much. Citric acid could effectively reduce the lag. Pseudo rst-order model was proved suitable for the description of PT degradation, revealing that PT degradation could be enhanced in presence of DMS regardless of its concentration. A modi ed Gompertz model, incorporated the lag phase, was developed for the description of DMS degradation in the mixture, revealing that DMS degradation depended on the initial PT concentration. When the lag was not considered, PT with low-concentration could promote DMS biodegradation, while a higher concentration ( 20 mg•L −1 ) cast negative effect. IntroductionVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) are widely considered as major precursors for the photochemical smog and haze, imposing great threats on environment quality and human health. As a typical kind of VOCs, volatile organic sulfur compounds (VOSCs) are highly toxic and malodorous with extremely low smell threshold, (Padhi and Gokhale 2017). They are not only the main composition of traditional malodor sources, i.e. waste water treatment plants, waste land lls, livestock and poultry farm etc., but also closely related with pharmaceutical chemicals, petroleum re neries, papermaking and other industries (Giri and Pandey 2013;Giri et al. 2014). So far, many treatment technologies, like condensation, UV oxidation, regenerative thermal oxidization, catalytically incineration, adsorption etc., have been employed for the disposal of odorous and hazardous organic compounds (Durme et al. 2008;Zhang et al. 2017). Thereinto, biotechnology is one of the most applicable ways for the puri cation of VOSCs, due to its various advantages of ecological, low cost and no secondary pollution etc., especially for the waste gas with high-volume and low-concentration (Jo and Shin 2010; Qiu and Deshusses 2017; Kennes and Veiga 2013).To date, numerous microorganisms have been acclimated and isolated for the degradation of VOSCs.These microorganisms are usually highly speci c, only one or one kind of VOSC compounds can be e ciently degraded. However, multiple waste gases usually coexist in practical situations. Unknown interactions are likely to occur during their degradation processes, which may largely in uence their original degradation behaviors. It was reported that the removal of dimethyl sul de (DMS) and dimethyl disul de were affected by the presence of methyl mercaptan and H 2

show abstract

A solid composite microbial inoculant for the simultaneous removal of volatile organic sulfide compounds: Preparation, characterization, and its bioaugmentation of a biotrickling filter

Cited by 29 publications

References 23 publications

Microbial Blends: Terminology Overview and Introduction of the Neologism “Skopobiota”

Microbial Blends: Terminology Overview and Introduction of the Neologism “Skopobiota”

Co-substrate-Assisted Dimethyl Sulfide Degradation and Electricity Generation in a Microbial Fuel Cell

Simultaneous biodegradation of dimethyl sulfide and 1-propanethiol by Pseudomonas putida S-1 and Alcaligenes sp. SY1: “Lag” cause, reduction, and kinetics exploration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About