1993
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90077-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solid-state n.m.r. study of microphase structure and segmental dynamics of poly(styrene-b-methylphenylsiloxane) diblock copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviations are within 5%. Moreover, the deviation is quite insensitive to the mixing times, in contrast to earlier observations 17,20 where deviations increase at longer mixing times. The simulated long cubic period was found to be 24.6 nm, also close to the small angle X-ray scattering value of 27.6 nm based on a two-phase model in a body-centered-cubic lattice.…”
Section: B the Interfacial Thicknesscontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The deviations are within 5%. Moreover, the deviation is quite insensitive to the mixing times, in contrast to earlier observations 17,20 where deviations increase at longer mixing times. The simulated long cubic period was found to be 24.6 nm, also close to the small angle X-ray scattering value of 27.6 nm based on a two-phase model in a body-centered-cubic lattice.…”
Section: B the Interfacial Thicknesscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…As pointed out before, 20 the presence of an interphase causes a slow increase of the NMR signal at short mixing times and an earlier equilibration for the spin diffusion process. This results in a sigmoidal behavior for the spin diffusion curve.…”
Section: B the Interfacial Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One could either retain the quantitative aspect by observing protons and using very fast MAS (g30 kHz) and high fields (g600 MHz), requiring the resolution of ambiguities in phase-specific detection (by deconvolution of lines with different width) and severely reduced spin diffusion coefficients. 23 An alternative is of course the well established, but more time-consuming and less quantitative indirect observation via a short, thus rigid-phase specific cross-polarization to 13 C. 10,11,13 A possible limitation that has as yet not been addressed in the spin diffusion literature is the distinction between a faster intrachain transfer (along a curvilinear path) and a slower, interchain transfer, in particular for the mobile phase. This would correspond to locally anisotropic spin diffusion effects as a result of different intra-and interchain residual dipolar couplings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] In such experiments, the initial proton magnetization is selectively suppressed in one of the phases (most often the rigid phase, using "dipolar filters" that suppress signal from strongly dipolarcoupled segments), and then re-equilibrates due to an also dipolar-mediated flip-flop process that has the characteristic of a diffusion process and provides spatial information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%