2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solubility and surface complexation study of a non-stoichiometric hydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the compilation of experimental determinations of P-dissolution rates of HAP and FAP by Palandri and Kharaka (2004), the dissolution rate of HAP is found to be about an order of magnitude slower than that of FAP under highly acidic conditions (K(HAP) = 10 −4.29 and K(FAP) = 10 −3.73 for pH = 0), while under neutral conditions, HAP is found to dissolve 2 orders of magnitude faster than FAP (K(HAP) = 10 −6 and K(FAP) = 10 −8 for pH = 7). Moreover, HAP is measured to have an almost 8 times larger specific surface area (80.5 m 2 g −1 , Bengtsson et al, 2009) compared to that of FAP (10.7 m 2 g −1 ), which is in agreement with the measured specific surface areas of 8.1-16 m 2 g −1 for sedimentary FAP (Guidry and Mackenzie, 2003). Guidry and Mackenzie (2003) have experimentally derived different rate constants (K) for FAP dissolution ranging from 5.75 × 10 −6 to 6.53 × 10 −11 mol m −2 s −1 , with a pH ranging from 2 to 8.5.…”
Section: Phosphorus Acid-solubilization Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the compilation of experimental determinations of P-dissolution rates of HAP and FAP by Palandri and Kharaka (2004), the dissolution rate of HAP is found to be about an order of magnitude slower than that of FAP under highly acidic conditions (K(HAP) = 10 −4.29 and K(FAP) = 10 −3.73 for pH = 0), while under neutral conditions, HAP is found to dissolve 2 orders of magnitude faster than FAP (K(HAP) = 10 −6 and K(FAP) = 10 −8 for pH = 7). Moreover, HAP is measured to have an almost 8 times larger specific surface area (80.5 m 2 g −1 , Bengtsson et al, 2009) compared to that of FAP (10.7 m 2 g −1 ), which is in agreement with the measured specific surface areas of 8.1-16 m 2 g −1 for sedimentary FAP (Guidry and Mackenzie, 2003). Guidry and Mackenzie (2003) have experimentally derived different rate constants (K) for FAP dissolution ranging from 5.75 × 10 −6 to 6.53 × 10 −11 mol m −2 s −1 , with a pH ranging from 2 to 8.5.…”
Section: Phosphorus Acid-solubilization Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the hydroxyapatite was studied using the pH from 7 to 11. The composition of the surface phase of hydroxyapatite is constant in solution of pH in the range 4-10 ( Bengston et al 2009). Since hydroxyapatite is Adsorption (2016) 22:697-706 701 the salt of slight acid, it could run over two-step hydrolysis in an aqueous solution on the hydroxyapatite surface.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Sr 21 Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface ion composition (and hence the surface charge) of HAp in aqueous medium varies according to the ion composition of the medium, and HAp surfaces show negative charges in aqueous media under neutral pH 41) . The deviation of the Ca/P ratio from the stoichiometric value (Ca/P molar ratio=10/6) would also result in a decrease in the negative surface charge on the HAp surface in an aqueous medium 42) due to an increase in the solubility of HAp 41) and the degree of re-adsorption of PO4 3− ions onto the HAp surface 43) . In this study, the CPC adsorption onto the HAp nanoparticles with different morphologies showed a Langmuir-type adsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%