2014
DOI: 10.3390/s140609878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Solution-Based Temperature Sensor Using the Organic Compound CuTsPc

Abstract: An electrochemical cell using an organic compound, copper (II) phthalocyanine-tetrasulfonic acid tetrasodium salt (CuTsPc,) has been fabricated and investigated as a solution-based temperature sensor. The capacitance and resistance of the ITO/CuTsPc solution/ITO chemical cell has been characterized as a function of temperature in the temperature range of 25–80 °C. A linear response with minimal hysteresis is observed. The fabricated temperature sensor has shown high consistency and sensitive response towards a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response time is consistent with the thermal diffusion response time of the device (∼1.7 s), indicating that the temperature sensing response time is limited by the thermal diffusivity of the composite material (0.66 mm 2 s −1 ). In addition, this temperature sensing response time, which is slightly affected by the temperature and pressure ( Supplementary Figs 18 and 19 ), is consistent with those of many commercial and previously reported temperature sensors 39 40 . It is worth noting that both the sensitivity and response time of our fabricated devices can meet the requirements of many artificial intelligent systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The response time is consistent with the thermal diffusion response time of the device (∼1.7 s), indicating that the temperature sensing response time is limited by the thermal diffusivity of the composite material (0.66 mm 2 s −1 ). In addition, this temperature sensing response time, which is slightly affected by the temperature and pressure ( Supplementary Figs 18 and 19 ), is consistent with those of many commercial and previously reported temperature sensors 39 40 . It is worth noting that both the sensitivity and response time of our fabricated devices can meet the requirements of many artificial intelligent systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This signal originates from the pulsating nature of our breathing process, controlled by our heart rate . We report ultrafast response and recovery times of 421 ms and 5.27 s, respectively, compared to 20 s response and 30 s recovery time reported in the previously published literature …”
Section: Performance Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The response time and rest time are two important indexes for judging the sensitivity of sensors. As shown in Figure e, the calculated response time is 1.05 s. The response time is shorter than that of many previously reported temperature sensors, such as self‐powered porous polyurethane supported organic thermoelectric materials (1.7 s), and is consistent with the zirconate titanate microwire self‐powered temperature sensors (0.9 s) . We also note that the response time is longer than the other sensors, such as pressure sensors and some temperature sensor .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[23] An important application of the Ag 2 Te nanowire thermoelectric generator is working as a self-powered temperature sensor. As shown in Figure 6e, the calculated response time is 1.05 s. The response time is shorter than that of many previously reported temperature sensors, [24] such as self-powered porous polyurethane supported organic thermoelectric materials (1.7 s), [25] and is consistent with the zirconate titanate microwire self-powered temperature sensors (0.9 s). The temperature variation can be detected, when a finger touched/untouched the sensor (Figure 6b).…”
Section: Wwwadvelectronicmatdesupporting
confidence: 74%