A Solution to ARGESIM Benchmark C21 based on Modelica Components

Disselkamp, Jan-Philipp; Junglas, Peter; Niehüser, Alexander; Schönfelder, Phillip

doi:10.11128/sne.28.bn21.10411

Cited by 2 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…new1 [1] = atan2(state2 [1],state2 [2]); new1 [2] = (state2 [2] * state2 [3] -state2 [1] * state2 [4])/l^2; new2 [1] = l * sin(state1 [1]); new2 [2] = l * cos(state1 [1]); new2 [3] = l * state1 [2] * cos(state1 [1]); new2 [4] = -l * state1 [2] * sin(state1 [1]);…”

Section: Case Study Rotating Pendulum With Free Flight Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

“…To facilitate the implementation of the two systems a partial model SwitchableSystem has been defined that contains the state, the inputs and outputs and the triggering: Using this the implementation of a concrete system only needs the definition of the state equations, usually in form of an ODE. Even a graphical approach is possible [3], but MapleSim cannot cope with such a model.…”

Section: Case Study Rotating Pendulum With Free Flight Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

“…To add the events necessary for the addition of the 'kick' -i. e. a jump of the angular velocity by a factor γ at the lowest point -one needs a when-elsewhen construction. This did not work due to a bug in MapleSim, but a simple workaround could be found [3]. The kick value γ is defined by the initial conditions ψ 0 = 0 and (unknown) ω 0 and given end conditions ψ f and ω f .…”

Section: Sne 28(2) -6/2018mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The definition of the studied example systems in full detail can be found in [1]. Different approaches all based on Modelica components have been compared in [3], together with a discussion of underlying conceptions and encountered problems.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Using Dymola from Dassault Systemes leads to identical results in most cases. Some implementation problems that showed up in one or both systems as well as minor numerical deviations are described in [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Untitled

2018

SNE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dear Readers-This issue SNE 28(2) presents very interesting contributions, for instance the first Project Note contribution, and a Benchmark Note contribution of new style. SNE Volume 28 started offering the Project Note contribution for publication of project work, either as summary, or as report for (parts of) results, or as sketch of ongoing work, also aiming for discussion and feedback. Back in 1990, SNE started with publication of one-(and later two-) page solutions of the ARGESIM Benchmarks. In 2017, the publication possibilities for benchmark solutions have been extended. Depending on the benchmark, three types of 'solutions' can be submitted: i) a Benchmark Solution with concise description of model implementation and experimentation tasks (2 pages), ii) a Benchmark Report with sufficient detailed description of model implementation with variants and adequate experiment formulations (4-6 pages), and iii) a Benchmark Study presenting e.g. alternative or comparative modelling approaches and sketching analysis variants or supplemental model experiments (6-10 pages). This issue also continues with Vlatko eri 's algorithmic art as design for SNE cover pages. At right the cover pictures for SNE 28(1) and SNE 28(2) from the series BIRTH-the technique used is mapping and overlapping of squares emerging from a centre and fading out in colour. I would like to thank all authors for their contributions to SNE 28(2) showing the broad variety of simulation. And thanks to the editorial board members for review and support, and to the organizers of the EUROSIM conferences for cooperation in post-conference contributions. And last but not least thanks to the SNE Editorial Office for layout, typesetting, preparations for printing, with special thanks for support cooperation with Vlatko eri .

show abstract

Section: Case Study Rotating Pendulum With Free Flight Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case Study Rotating Pendulum With Free Flight Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sne 28(2) -6/2018mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Untitled

2018

SNE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Solving ARGESIM Benchmark C21 ’State Events and Structural-dynamic Systems’ with Simulink

Heitmann¹,

Junglas²,

Petrucha³

2021

SNE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To pinpoint the problems that come with the modeling and simulation of hybrid systems, the ARGESIM C21 benchmark 'State Events and Structuraldynamic Systems' describes three such systems and a lot of corresponding tasks. It is solved here using the well-known simulation environment Simulink, the solutions are based on a direct modeling of the ODEs or DAEs describing the systems. To this end, special schemes have been necessary sometimes, some of which are already provided by Simulink, others had to be modeled explicitely.

show abstract

A Solution to ARGESIM Benchmark C21 based on Modelica Components

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Solving ARGESIM Benchmark C21 ’State Events and Structural-dynamic Systems’ with Simulink

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About