Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71493-4_76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sound and Complete Proof Rule for Region Stability of Hybrid Systems

Abstract: Region stability allows one to formalize hybrid systems whose trajectories may oscillate (within a given allowance) even after having `stabilized'. Unfortunately, until today no proof rule (giving necessary and sufficient conditions for the purpose of verifying region stability) has been available. This paper fills the gap. Our (sound and complete) proof rule connects region stability with the finiteness of specific state sequences and thus with the emerging set of verification methods for program termination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sound and complete proof rules for establishing region stability have been explored and automated [47], as have more efficient encodings of the proof rule that scale better in dimensionality [31]. However, all algorithms we are aware of for checking region stability require linear or simpler (timed or rectangular) ODEs [45,47,46,31,11,48]. Strong attractors are basins of attraction where every state in the state space eventually reaches a region of the state space [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound and complete proof rules for establishing region stability have been explored and automated [47], as have more efficient encodings of the proof rule that scale better in dimensionality [31]. However, all algorithms we are aware of for checking region stability require linear or simpler (timed or rectangular) ODEs [45,47,46,31,11,48]. Strong attractors are basins of attraction where every state in the state space eventually reaches a region of the state space [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they are generated as a finite representation of an infinite path in a control flow graph. For example, in (potentially spurious) counterexamples in termination analysis [9,13,17,18,21,22], non-termination analysis [12], stability analysis [8,23], or cost analysis [1,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. used to establish temporal properties of systems such as safety, stability, termination, progress and so on [12,3,18,15]. The invariant generation problem consists of automatically computing useful invariants given the description of a dynamical system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%