2003
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2003.811888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sound projector for acoustic tomography and global ocean monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydroacoustics, Inc., HLF-5 sources with a center frequency of 250 Hz ͑Munk et al, 1995͒ were located at about 750-m depth, approximately on the sound-channel axis. Webb Research Corporation ͑WRC͒ swept-frequency sources with a center frequency of 275 Hz ͑Morozov and Webb, 2003Webb, , 2007Webb et al, 2002͒ were located at about 3000-m depth, slightly above the estimated surface conjugate depth ͑Table I͒.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydroacoustics, Inc., HLF-5 sources with a center frequency of 250 Hz ͑Munk et al, 1995͒ were located at about 750-m depth, approximately on the sound-channel axis. Webb Research Corporation ͑WRC͒ swept-frequency sources with a center frequency of 275 Hz ͑Morozov and Webb, 2003Webb, , 2007Webb et al, 2002͒ were located at about 3000-m depth, slightly above the estimated surface conjugate depth ͑Table I͒.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is based on the similarity of mechanical differential equations and equations for ordinary electrical elements, such as capacitors, inductors, resistors, and transformers. 20 The model is simpler than the finite element analysis, 20 and it does not need special software or powerful computers to facilitate the prediction of precise projector parameters. This model was continuously compared with experimental data from the actual projector test.…”
Section: Tunable Resonator Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During manufacture, the wall thickness was changed from 0.0095 m, as was used during simulation, to 0.0125 m. As a result, the resonance frequency increased to 25 Hz and sources were sweeping from 225 to 325 Hz. The prototype source manufactured with a 0.0095 m wall 20 swept in the expected 200-300-Hz frequency band. Unfortunately, the first prototype used an actuator with a very low rate, which did not allow testing of high-rate frequency sweeping.…”
Section: Experimental Testing Of Tunable Organ Pipesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ideally, these alternative sound sources should be capable of producing a signal that maintains the wide bandwidth of explosive charges with reduced amplitude to satisfy environmental concerns. Sound sources such as low frequency shakers [5] and resonators [6] have been developed, but often do not have the bandwidth, convenience, and efficiency of explosive charges. A number of other sources are described in Dobrin [7], but the CSS differs from all of these, and is more similar to an explosive source in the following manner: The CSS generates pressure directly in the water, and no energy is lost through motion of an elastic membrane, as in the Aquapulse (trademark of Western Geophysical Co.) or through the motion of any mechanical piston or valve as in sparkers or boomers [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%