1959
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(59)90533-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A source of false positives in cytologic interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, they are pathologically intriguing since they can be potentially misinterpreted and misdiagnosed as malignancy, viral infection, or other previously described histopathologic structures, such as Bbs or Hbs. Bbbs very closely resemble Bbs, as described first on Papanicolaou-stained vaginal smears in 1959 by Milligan et al [5] and further characterized in 1999 by Abdulla et al [8] Although the two bodies bear close similitude, characteristic location, morphology and staining profile (special and immunohistochemical) allows a clear distinction. For instance, Bbbs reside in lymph node tissue and show higher size variability ranging from 5-30 μ, as opposed to the 8-15 μ described for Bbs, which are found in vaginal smears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, they are pathologically intriguing since they can be potentially misinterpreted and misdiagnosed as malignancy, viral infection, or other previously described histopathologic structures, such as Bbs or Hbs. Bbbs very closely resemble Bbs, as described first on Papanicolaou-stained vaginal smears in 1959 by Milligan et al [5] and further characterized in 1999 by Abdulla et al [8] Although the two bodies bear close similitude, characteristic location, morphology and staining profile (special and immunohistochemical) allows a clear distinction. For instance, Bbbs reside in lymph node tissue and show higher size variability ranging from 5-30 μ, as opposed to the 8-15 μ described for Bbs, which are found in vaginal smears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore, characterization of unique structures that could be confused with atypical cells (malignant or virally infected) or known pathologic bodies remains significant. For example, the so-called blue blobs (Bbs) described by Milligan et al [5] may be a source of misdiagnosis in postmenopausal vaginal smears, since they simulate malignancy. Likewise, a few structures such as crystals or Liesegang rings have been confused with parasitic organisms and may be associated with malignancy [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such instances a simple solution may be to treat with estrogens and repeat the smear after restoration of the epithelium. In a study by Melligan et al, 1 estrogenic stimulation appeared to decrease the number of Bbs or eliminate them. A debatable situation may be clarified by colposcopic evaluation and tissue biopsy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of atrophic smears contain cyanophilic bodies that were colloquially termed "blue blobs" (Bbs) by Melligan et al in 1959. 1 Those authors thought Bbs to be resting or altered forms of trichomonads since trichomonads were seen in 86.6% of the cervicovaginal smears they examined. The origin and precise composition of Bbs is still disputed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%