2007
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2007.909605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Space-Mapping Approach to Microwave Device Modeling Exploiting Fuzzy Systems

Abstract: Abstract-We present a novel surrogate modeling methodology based on a combination of space mapping and fuzzy systems. Fine model data, the so-called base set, is assumed available in the region of interest. Although we do not assume any particular location of the base points, it is preferable that they form a uniform mesh. The standard space-mapping surrogate is established using available fine model data. The fuzzy system is then set up to interpolate the differences between the space-mapping surrogate and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue with SM is fixed number of extractable parameters which limits the model flexibility. This particular difficulty can be alleviated, to some extent by SM enhancement through fuzzy systems [26], radial-basis functions [23], or Kriging [27]. The problem of excessive number of training samples necessary to establish a reliable surrogate can be partially addressed by modeling methods that rely on appropriately extracted response features (e.g., shape-preserving response prediction [28], or feature-based modeling [29], however, these methods impose relatively strong assumptions on the response shapes of the structures under consideration so their applicability is limited to certain types of devices [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue with SM is fixed number of extractable parameters which limits the model flexibility. This particular difficulty can be alleviated, to some extent by SM enhancement through fuzzy systems [26], radial-basis functions [23], or Kriging [27]. The problem of excessive number of training samples necessary to establish a reliable surrogate can be partially addressed by modeling methods that rely on appropriately extracted response features (e.g., shape-preserving response prediction [28], or feature-based modeling [29], however, these methods impose relatively strong assumptions on the response shapes of the structures under consideration so their applicability is limited to certain types of devices [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue with SM is fixed number of extractable parameters which limits the model flexibility. This particular difficulty can be alleviated, to some extent by SM enhancement through fuzzy systems [21], radial-basis functions [18], or Kriging [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SM modeling with variable weight coefficients [25] provides efficient utilization of available fine model data, however, at the expense of computational overhead related to a separate parameter extraction process required for each evaluation of the surrogate. SM modeling enhanced by fuzzy systems [26], radial basis functions [22], or Kriging [27] offer accuracy comparable with [25] without compromising computational cost; however, the implementation of these models is somewhat complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%