2013
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2012.2226553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Space-Time Mixed Galerkin Marching-on-in-Time Scheme for the Time-Domain Combined Field Integral Equation

Abstract: Abstract-The time domain combined field integral equation (TD-CFIE), which is constructed from a weighted sum of the time domain electric and magnetic field integral equations (TD-EFIE and TD-MFIE) for analyzing transient scattering from closed perfect electrically conducting bodies, is free from spurious resonances. The standard marching-on-in-time technique for discretizing the TD-CFIE uses Galerkin and collocation schemes in space and time, respectively. Unfortunately, the standard scheme is theoretically n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implicit MOT scheme require at every time step solution of the linear system [3], which is traditionally constructed upon expanding the flux density with Schaubert-Wilton-Glisson (SWG) spatial basis functions [8] and piecewise polynomial temporal basis functions [9], followed by Galerkin and point testing in space and time, respectively. In addition, modern implicit MOT-based solution of time domain surface and volume integral equations can be made low-and high-frequency stable by using computationally more expensive space-time discretization techniques, such as bandlimited time discretization [7,10], space-time Galerkin testing [11,12], quasi-Helmholtz decomposition [13,14], and highly accurate evaluation of MOT matrix elements [12,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. In contrast, the explicit MOT scheme, usually leverages pulse spatial basis functions and low order temporal basis functions and point testing both in space and time.…”
Section: > Replace This Line With Your Paper Identification Number (Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicit MOT scheme require at every time step solution of the linear system [3], which is traditionally constructed upon expanding the flux density with Schaubert-Wilton-Glisson (SWG) spatial basis functions [8] and piecewise polynomial temporal basis functions [9], followed by Galerkin and point testing in space and time, respectively. In addition, modern implicit MOT-based solution of time domain surface and volume integral equations can be made low-and high-frequency stable by using computationally more expensive space-time discretization techniques, such as bandlimited time discretization [7,10], space-time Galerkin testing [11,12], quasi-Helmholtz decomposition [13,14], and highly accurate evaluation of MOT matrix elements [12,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. In contrast, the explicit MOT scheme, usually leverages pulse spatial basis functions and low order temporal basis functions and point testing both in space and time.…”
Section: > Replace This Line With Your Paper Identification Number (Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete the whole MOT solver, temporal convolutions between the potentials and the temporal basis functions have to be performed as indicated in Eqs. (7) and (8). However, it must be emphasized that the discontinuities in α(r, t) are very important and determinative for the singular behavior existing in Eqs.…”
Section: −1 Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods reduce the accuracy, increase the computation complexity and are invalid for large-scale and complex geometric structures. Later, implicit time stepping algorithms and appropriate smooth temporal basis functions are also proposed to overcome the above mentioned drawbacks [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Recent studies show that accuracy computation of the MOT impedance matrix is considered as a cure factor, effecting the late time stability and accuracy of the MOT solver [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method decreases the dimensionality of the problem by 1 dimension which, when combined with modern matrix-vector product acceleration techniques, leads to a method whose computational efficiency is second to none. For details of the state-of-the-art discretization and implementation of marching-on-in-time space-time Galerkin methods, the reader is referred to, for example, [1]- [5].…”
Section: Introduction the Simulation Of Transient Electromagnetic mentioning
confidence: 99%