2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial and environmental analysis of shark attacks on Reunion Island (1980–2017)

Abstract: FT and SG conceived and designed the study, collected the data, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. MT, DP and MD analysed the data. FT conceived the interactive map and DP coded it. All authors proofread and approved the final manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deeper waters could also have a reverse effect, as observed, for example, for the island state of Réunion. There, the topographical features limit the involved sharks to being part of resident populations, so largely eliminating transient sharks along those shorelines, making the resident sharks more prominent year-round [33,34]. This situation around Réunion indicates that the two main species-the tiger shark and the bull shark-are not just part of resident populations; they also seem to be more shore-oriented, again, due to the deeper waters surrounding Réunion likely providing less food for these sharks.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Presented Trend Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deeper waters could also have a reverse effect, as observed, for example, for the island state of Réunion. There, the topographical features limit the involved sharks to being part of resident populations, so largely eliminating transient sharks along those shorelines, making the resident sharks more prominent year-round [33,34]. This situation around Réunion indicates that the two main species-the tiger shark and the bull shark-are not just part of resident populations; they also seem to be more shore-oriented, again, due to the deeper waters surrounding Réunion likely providing less food for these sharks.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Presented Trend Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the low probabilities of being bitten by a shark (generally less than 1 attack million people −1 year −1 ) even in the highest-incident regions of the world [ 1 4 ], these events attract disproportionately high attention from the media, the public, politicians and bureaucrats [ 5 , 6 ]. This occurs even with the knowledge that about 15% of all incidents worldwide result in a human fatality [ 4 ], although it is considerably higher (46%) in Réunion [ 7 ]. While the disconnect has interesting psychological origins [ 8 ], the repercussions for the conservation of shark species are potentially serious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second-highest number has occurred in Australia, with an increasing rate of 0.35 attacks year −1 over a similar period driven mainly by trends in the most populous state of New South Wales [ 24 ]. Other, high-incident regions include South Africa (stable) [ 24 ], Brazil (increasing by 0.07 attacks year −1 ) [ 25 ], Réunion (increasing at 0.05 attacks year −1 ) [ 7 ] and the Bahamas (stable) [ 25 ]. Given ongoing increases in the number of people engaged in in-water activities [ 26 ], it is logical to anticipate increases in shark bites over the coming decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, bull sharks have been implicated in attacks on humans, particularly in Reunion island. Since 2011, the mean number of shark bites per year increased markedly in Reunion Island, from 1.1 to 3 for the periods 1980-2010 and 2011-2019 respectively [7]. Between 2011 and 2019, 27 attacks (including 11 fatal shark bites) occurred in Reunion Island, representing on average 10% of fatal attacks worldwide during the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%