1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1646(199807/08)14:4<329::aid-rrr505>3.3.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: animal unit; TWh = terawatt hour. Riverine ecosystems are particularly sensitive to environmental change occurring within the basin because of the high degree of longitudinal connectivity; for instance, a large dam can alter thermal, sediment, and flow regimes far downstream (Richter et al 1998;Graf 2006). Headwater disturbances (eg surface mining) can modify water quality and ecological conditions for many kilometers (Lindberg et al 2011).…”
Section: Figure 2 the Influence Of Land-use/land-cover Patches At Mumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: animal unit; TWh = terawatt hour. Riverine ecosystems are particularly sensitive to environmental change occurring within the basin because of the high degree of longitudinal connectivity; for instance, a large dam can alter thermal, sediment, and flow regimes far downstream (Richter et al 1998;Graf 2006). Headwater disturbances (eg surface mining) can modify water quality and ecological conditions for many kilometers (Lindberg et al 2011).…”
Section: Figure 2 the Influence Of Land-use/land-cover Patches At Mumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richter, Baumgartner, Powell, and Braun (1996) and Richter, Braun, Mendelson, and Master (1997) developed hydrologic indicators (HIs) to assess the degree to which human disturbance affects hydrologic regimes and proposed the range of variability approach (RVA) with the aim of setting stream flow-based river management targets that incorporate the concepts of hydrologic variability and aquatic ecosystem integrity. RVA has been proven a practical and effective means of assessing hydrological alteration and has been applied to many river basins around the world that represent a variety of watershed and hydrologic regime types (Knight et al, 2014, Koel & Sparks, 2002, Richter, Baumgartner, Braun, & Powell, 1998, Shiau & Wu, 2004b. The Three Gorges Reservoir had more significant impacts on monthly sediment concentration than monthly discharge (Zhang, Wu et al, 2012a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IHA method was implemented to assess hydrological alteration of streamflow regime parameters between two defined periods: historical and far or near future at a given river reach (Richter et al, 1996(Richter et al, , 1998. The IHA method contains a subset of 33 parameters grouped into five sets of hydrologic features: magnitude, timing, frequency, duration and rate of change (The Nature Conservancy 2009).…”
Section: Assessmentofstreamflowchangewith Indicatorsofhydrologicalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWAT is a hydrological model that simulates run-off and streamflow (among other variables) with a daily time step on a catchment scale, which is suitable for large-scale studies (Arnold, Srinivasan, Muttiah & Williams, 1998). The SWAT model has been used in combination with the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) methodology (Richter, Baumgartner, Braun & Powell, 1998;Richter, Baumgartner, Powell & Braun, 1996) to assess climate change impact on a single fish species habitat suitability by Morid, Delavar, Eagderi and Kumar (2016) and Papadaki et al (2015). The IHA consists of 33 parameters that describe the hydrological regime as: magnitude, timing, frequency, duration and rate of change (The Nature Conservancy 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%