2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial panel data approach to estimating U.S. state-level energy emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to question its reliability with different assumptions and specifications. Besides, some scholars like to offer policy implications in their literature (e.g., [6,7,90]). One should not ignore that policy suggestions heavily rely on the robustness of applied model and the endogeneity of explanatory variables.…”
Section: Robustness Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to question its reliability with different assumptions and specifications. Besides, some scholars like to offer policy implications in their literature (e.g., [6,7,90]). One should not ignore that policy suggestions heavily rely on the robustness of applied model and the endogeneity of explanatory variables.…”
Section: Robustness Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy consumption is always a factor that was taken into account by many scholars in the studies of air pollution [2,3,6,90]. The coal combustion is one of the major sources of SO 2 emission.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns over these dangers have led researchers to explore more actively the CO2 emissions among countries, particularly by attempting to determine whether or not an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for CO2 actually exists. Yet previous studies have found mixed results for a CO2 EKC (Burnett et al, 2013b;Poudel et al, 2009), thereby leading some researchers like Aldy (2005) and Martinez-Zarzoso et al (2007) to call for additional investigations into the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the relationship between CO 2 emissions and the related influencing factors have been analyzed using spatial panel data models at the global level [35][36][37][38][39], national level [40,41], and provincial level [42][43][44][45]. There are numerous advantages to spatial panel data models, including improved efficiency with increasing degrees of freedom, the capability of controlling individual heterogeneity, and reduced the effects of collinearity among different variables [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%