Advances in Forest Fire Research 2022 2022
DOI: 10.14195/978-989-26-2298-9_209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatially explicit model of litter accumulation in fire maintained longleaf pine forest ecosystems of the Southeastern USA

Abstract: The continuity and depth of the surface fuel layer (i.e., litter and duff) are major drivers of fire spread and fuel consumption. Nevertheless, its spatial explicit quantification over relatively large areas remains unresolved: local fuel heterogeneity introduces large uncertainties in estimates derived from field-based models and sparse data samples. Besides that, the sensitivity of remote sensors to surface litter loads is limited, particularly under canopy cover. In fire-maintained pine forests of the South… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous research at these sites did not detect differences in some fire-related characteristics of basal and open locations after one fire (Kreye et al, 2020), the occurrence of certain species close to and away from pines could reflect the longterm fire history at each point (Brewer, 2023). In addition, they could result from spatial patterns of pine litter deposition, which has been shown to vary with time since fire, decomposition rate, stand structure, and direction of prevailing winds (Blaydes et al, 2023;Sánchez-López et al, 2023). Fine-scale fuel heterogeneity results in spatial variation in plant survival and establishment through aboveground fire intensity or soil heating (Platt et al, 2016;Kennard & Outcalt 2006), which ultimately manifests in differential community assembly over time (Mugnani et al, 2019;Robertson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although previous research at these sites did not detect differences in some fire-related characteristics of basal and open locations after one fire (Kreye et al, 2020), the occurrence of certain species close to and away from pines could reflect the longterm fire history at each point (Brewer, 2023). In addition, they could result from spatial patterns of pine litter deposition, which has been shown to vary with time since fire, decomposition rate, stand structure, and direction of prevailing winds (Blaydes et al, 2023;Sánchez-López et al, 2023). Fine-scale fuel heterogeneity results in spatial variation in plant survival and establishment through aboveground fire intensity or soil heating (Platt et al, 2016;Kennard & Outcalt 2006), which ultimately manifests in differential community assembly over time (Mugnani et al, 2019;Robertson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As in most savannas, pyrophilic plants form a continuous layer of surface vegetation and fire-resistant trees (here longleaf pines) form an incomplete canopy (Peet et al, 2018). The spatial heterogeneity of the pine canopy creates variation in fire severity through differences in pine needle and grass fuel loads (Ellair and Platt, 2013; Platt et al, 2016b; Sánchez-López et al, 2023). Previous work in this system has linked variation in fire severity and frequency to changes in fungal (SemenovaLJNelsen et al, 2019) and bacterial communities (Dao et al 2022), as well as reduced decomposition (Hopkins et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have used the independent factor scores derived from multivariate technique of principal component factor analysis to soil and leaf litter properties [3,11,12]. The modelling component of leaf litter decomposition is widely reported in scientific literatures [13,14]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, there is dearth of information on the interrelationships among mass loss and litter chemistry traits of leaf litters using a multivariate approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%