2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatiotemporal atlas of MR intensity, tissue probability and shape of the fetal brain with application to segmentation

Abstract: Modeling and analysis of MR images of the developing human brain is a challenge due to rapid changes in brain morphology and morphometry. We present an approach to the construction of a spatiotemporal atlas of the fetal brain with temporal models of MR intensity, tissue probability and shape changes. This spatiotemporal model is created from a set of reconstructed MR images of fetal subjects with different gestational ages. Groupwise registration of manual segmentations and voxelwise nonlinear modeling allow u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
135
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Image processing stage Quantification of in vivo fetal brain development is technically challenging (Limperopoulos and Clouchoux 2009;Rousseau et al 2006;Jiang et al 2007;Habas et al 2010). Ultrafast T2-weighted MR images provide good contrast between the different developing cerebral tissues, however, combined fetal and maternal motion during data acquisition results in image degradation (Jiang et al 2007;Rousseau et al 2006;Clouchoux et al 2010b;Gholipour et al 2010a).…”
Section: Subjects and Mri Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Image processing stage Quantification of in vivo fetal brain development is technically challenging (Limperopoulos and Clouchoux 2009;Rousseau et al 2006;Jiang et al 2007;Habas et al 2010). Ultrafast T2-weighted MR images provide good contrast between the different developing cerebral tissues, however, combined fetal and maternal motion during data acquisition results in image degradation (Jiang et al 2007;Rousseau et al 2006;Clouchoux et al 2010b;Gholipour et al 2010a).…”
Section: Subjects and Mri Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this study, the white matter encompassed several lamination layers, including unmyelinated white matter, subplate, intermediate layer and myelinated white matter, depending on the gestational age (Kostovic and Judas 2002). In vivo fetal brain tissue segmentation is a very complex problem (Habas et al 2010), even with high-resolution image reconstruction, primarily because of the inherently low contrast between fetal brain tissue types. An atlas-based segmentation method based on manual delineation of fetal brain tissues has been described (Habas et al 2010), that facilitates in vivo fetal brain tissue segmentation.…”
Section: White Matter Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the embedding coordinates, given by the manifold learning step. This application contrasts with the methods of, for example Habas et al [28] and Murgasova et al [29] which provide important qualitative snapshots of development directly from the image data, and our quantitative embedding coordinates, provided by combined measure manifold learning, may potentially be directly applied in a wider range of contexts, such as clustering or classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A common characterisation of the developing brain is obtained through spatio-temporal atlases of cross-sectional data acquired at different ages. Good examples are provided by Habas et al [28] and Murgasova et al [29] for fetal and neonatal data respectively. Adaptations of segmentation techniques to neonatal and fetal data have also been developed in the contexts of longitudinal analysis of neonatal and fetal data [30], [31] and of multi-region atlas-based segmentation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic methods rarely work well with medical images due to ambiguous appearance cues. Prior-knowledge brought from different patients in the form of shape/appearance models or propagated atlases [6] may help make the segmentation more robust, but the position and orientation of the placenta within the uterus varies greatly between pregnancies (see Fig. 1(a) and Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%