2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A specialized forest carnivore navigates landscape-level disturbance: Canada lynx in spruce-beetle impacted forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A linear model with a slope coefficient (±90% CI) that did not overlap 1 (i.e., slope is significantly different from 1, p < 0.1) represented a functional response in habitat use (Holbrook et al, 2019). Statistical deviations from proportional habitat use (slope = 1, and y ‐intercept = 0) could indicate a diversity of responses (positive or negative) that deviate from proportional habitat use (Holbrook et al, 2019; Squires et al, 2020). We then plotted response curves while also displaying the interquartile range (IQR) of availability across all groups (sexes and time periods) for each variable; the IQR aided in contextualizing response curves and availability for each variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A linear model with a slope coefficient (±90% CI) that did not overlap 1 (i.e., slope is significantly different from 1, p < 0.1) represented a functional response in habitat use (Holbrook et al, 2019). Statistical deviations from proportional habitat use (slope = 1, and y ‐intercept = 0) could indicate a diversity of responses (positive or negative) that deviate from proportional habitat use (Holbrook et al, 2019; Squires et al, 2020). We then plotted response curves while also displaying the interquartile range (IQR) of availability across all groups (sexes and time periods) for each variable; the IQR aided in contextualizing response curves and availability for each variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As landscapes are altered through time from increasing disturbance, it is crucial to understand resulting changes in habitat relationships at the individual and population level (Anderson et al, 2012; Shoemaker et al, 2018; Squires et al, 2020). The responses of populations toward anthropogenic influences are often inconsistent, usually associated with local environmental conditions (Mumma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research determined mountain lions were not selective between male and female mule deer in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA (Pierce et al, 2004 ); therefore we included kill site locations of both male and female deer together into our model. We sampled available locations within the study area at a density of 1 per km 2 , resulting in a ratio of 1:70 (Northrup et al, 2016 ; Squires et al, 2020 ). We used the same topographic variables used in the probability of encounter RF models (Appendix S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this density of availability resulted in less than a 1:1 ratio, we increased our sample to a ratio of 1:5. This approach ensured adequate spatial coverage of availability, while also exceeding guidelines suggested to generate stable coefficients in a relatively homogenous environment (Northrup et al, 2016;Squires et al, 2020). We modeled predicted use by elk, coyotes, and mountain lions using habitat and topographic variables expected to influence selection by these species including elevation, slope, topographic position index (de Reu et al, 2013), terrain ruggedness index (Riley et al, 1999), distance to primary roads, distance to secondary roads, transformed circular aspect (Roberts & Cooper, 1989), distance to aspen, and distance to forest.…”
Section: Spatial Variation In Risk: Probability Of Encountermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, NDVI, canopy cover, and maximum average summer temperature had unexpected influences in our cell‐level analysis. Previous studies reported lynx habitat selection related to lower annual temperature (King et al 2020), and reduced summer heat load (Holbrook et al 2017, Squires et al 2020). We found a positive relationship between probability of occupancy and average maximum summer temperature, although there is some uncertainty in the effect strength, as the lower 95% confidence interval crossed zero (−0.019; Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%