2013
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01484-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Specific Population of Abnormal Prion Protein Aggregates Is Preferentially Taken Up by Cells and Disaggregated in a Strain-Dependent Manner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that strain specific differences in PrP Sc , such as sialylation, does not affect the initial targeting, which is consistent with previous work [57,58], however, the contribution of sialylation to newly formed PrP Sc in the spleen is not known [59]. We can not exclude the possibility that strain-specific requirements for cellular entry explain the failure to establish infection, however, prion uptake studies in cell culture are not consistent this hypothesis [60,61]. Detailed analysis of the early events in HY and DY TME pathogenesis failed to identify strain specific differences in transport to secondary LRS tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We hypothesize that strain specific differences in PrP Sc , such as sialylation, does not affect the initial targeting, which is consistent with previous work [57,58], however, the contribution of sialylation to newly formed PrP Sc in the spleen is not known [59]. We can not exclude the possibility that strain-specific requirements for cellular entry explain the failure to establish infection, however, prion uptake studies in cell culture are not consistent this hypothesis [60,61]. Detailed analysis of the early events in HY and DY TME pathogenesis failed to identify strain specific differences in transport to secondary LRS tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, differences in infectivity cannot necessarily be attributed to different PrP Sc subpopulations separable by conventional methods such as sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Rather, the finding that biophysically more stable PrP Sc aggregates associated with a non-productive strain are more efficiently disaggregated intracellularly 83 is in line with the hypothesis that prion strains are differentially trafficked through the endolysosomal system post internalization. Identification of the subcellular compartments involved in prion strain propagation will be of considerable importance for understanding the pathogenesis associated with distinct prion strains and to unravel potential targets for prion disease intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, an interplay between the host cell and the physicochemical properties of prion aggregates could determine the predominant internalization pathway and access to the preferred intracellular compartments. Interestingly, immortalized brain cells have been shown to preferentially internalize PrP Sc subpopulations with comparable sedimentation properties, independent of the strain’s ability to infect cells 83 . Thus, differences in infectivity cannot necessarily be attributed to different PrP Sc subpopulations separable by conventional methods such as sucrose density gradient centrifugation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less is known about the mechanism underlying tissue tropism outside the CNS. It is possible that strain-specific replication cofactors or inhibitors govern PrP Sc formation; alternatively, strain-specific differences in the balance between PrP Sc formation and clearance may influence tissue tropism (Choi and Priola 2013).…”
Section: Prion Strain Tropismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies suggest strain-specific differences in the rate of prion replication in various tissues from natural and experimental prion disease but are limited by the complexity of the animal host and the resulting alternative explanations. For example, strain-specific differences in the rate of transport to new areas of the tissue that support prion formation, the rate of prion clearance, and differences in cell death all can contribute to the overall titer of a tissue (Ayers et al 2009;Choi and Priola 2013). In an attempt to overcome these weaknesses, the relative efficiency of PrP Sc formation was calculated using PMCA, which only measures PrP Sc formation and not clearance in a closed system (Shikiya et al 2014).…”
Section: Prion Strain Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%