1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1992.tb00564.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spectral analysis of geoid undulation and gravity anomaly data computed with Pratt's isostasy theory applied to Moho depth variations in Fennoscandia

Abstract: S U M M A R YT h e analysis shows that the spectra of geoid undulation (AN) and gravity anomaly (Ag) computed from t h e values implied by the OSU89B harmonic coefficients, degrees 4-100, Rapp & Pavlis (1990), do not fit the spectra of AN and Ag computed from values implied by a Pratt-type isostatic model applied to the Moho depth variations in Fennoscandia as suggested by Anderson (1984) and Marquart (1989). T h e magnitudes of the model spectra are that much larger than the OSU89B spectra that the relevance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geoid undulation mapping has been done extensively over the sea surfaces using satellite-based altimetry (Rapp 1983;Engelis and Knudsen 1989;Zlotnicki 1993). Limited work has been done over the continents, mainly because of the lack of spheroidal heights over the continental surfaces, although gravimetrically determined geoids have been studied exhaustively (Milbert 1992;Sjoberg and Nord 1992;Rapp 1993;Sideris 1993;Lemoine et al 1997). The latest geopotential model, EGM96 (Lemoine et al 1997), was developed jointly by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency and the Ohio State University, using: (a) satellite tracking data as well as altimeter data from TOPEX, GEOSAT and ERS-1; (b) 30¢´30¢ terrestrial gravity data from National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) archives; and (c) 30¢´30¢ gravity anomalies derived from the GEOSAT Geodetic Mission altimeter data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geoid undulation mapping has been done extensively over the sea surfaces using satellite-based altimetry (Rapp 1983;Engelis and Knudsen 1989;Zlotnicki 1993). Limited work has been done over the continents, mainly because of the lack of spheroidal heights over the continental surfaces, although gravimetrically determined geoids have been studied exhaustively (Milbert 1992;Sjoberg and Nord 1992;Rapp 1993;Sideris 1993;Lemoine et al 1997). The latest geopotential model, EGM96 (Lemoine et al 1997), was developed jointly by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency and the Ohio State University, using: (a) satellite tracking data as well as altimeter data from TOPEX, GEOSAT and ERS-1; (b) 30¢´30¢ terrestrial gravity data from National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) archives; and (c) 30¢´30¢ gravity anomalies derived from the GEOSAT Geodetic Mission altimeter data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions of the relation between the geoidal depression and the structure of the Moho were given in a series of studies, e.g. Sjöberg et al (1991, 1994), Nord (1992), and Nord & Sjöberg (1992). In these studies, an integral formulation and recent Moho maps were employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marquart (1993) seems (in her comment) to avoid the main problem, i.e. that it is almost impossible to correlate Moho depth with geoid undulation or gravity anomaly when one uses a better model [although the model for computing geoid undulation/gravity anomaly used in Sjoberg Nord and Faan (1991) and Nord & Sjoberg (1992) is far from perfect, it is more realistic than the model used in Marquart (1989)l to compute geoid undulation/gravity anomaly from Moho depths. These conclusions are the same independent of whether the comparison is made direct [as in Sjoberg et al (1991)] or in the spectral domain [as in Nord & Sjoberg (1992)l.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%