2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spectromicroscopy study of the corrosion of polymer coated steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of corrosion detected by analysis of the Fe L 3 -edge μ-XANES spectra from the two areas can be further confirmed by comparing these results to the Fe XRF maps (Figure 2D,E). Figure 2D indicates a higher Fe fluorescent intensity than that in Figure 2E when comparing the spots from the uncorroded regions (spots [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Comparing the Fe XRF maps from the heavily corroded regions from Areas 1 and 2 (spots 1-5) shows the difficulty in using just these XRF maps to determine which area is more corroded because both regions have similar Fe fluorescent counts (~1500 counts).…”
Section: Fe L 3 -Edge μ-Xanesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The extent of corrosion detected by analysis of the Fe L 3 -edge μ-XANES spectra from the two areas can be further confirmed by comparing these results to the Fe XRF maps (Figure 2D,E). Figure 2D indicates a higher Fe fluorescent intensity than that in Figure 2E when comparing the spots from the uncorroded regions (spots [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Comparing the Fe XRF maps from the heavily corroded regions from Areas 1 and 2 (spots 1-5) shows the difficulty in using just these XRF maps to determine which area is more corroded because both regions have similar Fe fluorescent counts (~1500 counts).…”
Section: Fe L 3 -Edge μ-Xanesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reason why the spectra from spots 1 to 4 in Area 2 have a higher Fe (III) contribution may be due to exposure to O 2 (g) during the corrosion test or The comparison of the fitted TEY and PFY Fe L 3 -edge μ-XANES spectra from Area 1 and Area 2 demonstrates that Area 1 was less corroded than Area 2 due to the higher ratio of iron metal to iron oxides (Fe (II/III) + Fe (III)) detected in the spectra from Area 1. For example, from the TEY LCF fitting results, the ratio of rebar to Fe (II/ III) from the spots located in the uncorroded region (spots [15][16][17][18][19][20] in Area 1 was between 0.96 and 1.27 (Table S1), while this ratio ranged from 0.25 to 0.75 (Table S3) for spots from Area 2 corresponding to the uncorroded regions (spots [15][16][17][18][19][20]. For the PFY fitting results from spots 15 to 20, the rebar to iron oxides ratio in Area 1 was either 19.00 or 24.00 (Table S2), while this ratio decreased to 13.29 to 19.00 (Table S4) when the spectra from Area 2 were studied, which is consistent when compared with the analysis of the TEY μ-XANES spectra.…”
Section: Fe L 3 -Edge μ-Xanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of steel rebar corrosion through a polymer film using X‐ray spectromicroscopy has been demonstrated by Situm et al and Barlow et al The methodology utilized was a combination of X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping using multiple excitation energies and Fe K‐edge X‐ray absorption near edge spectroscopy using a micrometer sized X‐ray beam (μ‐XANES) . The excitation energy of 7115 eV was used for XRF mapping because of the difference in absorption cross‐sections between unoxidized/bare Fe metal and oxidized Fe found in corrosion products . This difference in absorption cross‐sections allows for the detection of regions containing high Fe metal concentrations (low corrosion product concentration) or regions containing low Fe metal concentrations (high corrosion product concentration) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%