1981
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-198107000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spectrum Response Study on Single Strand DNA Breaks, Sister Chromatid Exchanges, and Lethality Induced by Phototherapy Lights

Abstract: SummaryLittle information is available on the effect of visible light from commercial fluorescence lamps, commonly used in the treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, on parameters related to genetic damage in eucaryotic cells. The present study was undertaken to determine whether or not visible light of different wavelengths had any differential effects on the frequency of DNA breaks (frank breaks plus alkaline labile lesions), DNA replication, frequency of Inese sister chromatid exchanges, and survival in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Light from standard fluorescent lamps causes breaks in DNA strands in vitro (3, 35) and increases sister chromatid exchanges and other chromosomal alterations in cultured cells (4,18,21,23,32,35,37). An increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange has been reported in some infants after phototherapy (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Light from standard fluorescent lamps causes breaks in DNA strands in vitro (3, 35) and increases sister chromatid exchanges and other chromosomal alterations in cultured cells (4,18,21,23,32,35,37). An increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange has been reported in some infants after phototherapy (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we know of no reports regarding any increase in sister chromatid exchange in vivo in response to monochromatic light, the occurrence seems likely; thus, the widespread use of phototherapy has generated concern regarding the potential for long-term mutagenic and carcinogenic effects. Inasmuch as most published data suggest that the offending wavelengths are principally in the ultraviolet range, some recent work has implicated light of wavelengths exceeding 300 nm (9) and, indeed, some alterations appear to occur maximally in response to wavelengths of light between 420-500 nrn (35). Although the magnitude of these latter risks has not been quantitated as they may relate to the clinical setting, it seems desirable to more precisely define the most efficacious wavelengths for the photoalteration of bilirubin that results in its enhanced excretion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concerns seem justified in view of DNA modifying activity of phototherapy (9), a property shared with many chemical carcinogens and teratogens (1). The photodynamic damage of intracellular DNA has been well characterized and is enhanced by, but not dependent upon, the presence of exogenous photosensitizing agents (3,7,10,11). Such enhancement takes on clinical significance when it is realized that many low birth-weight infants receiving phototherapy are simultaneously administered parenteral hyperalimentation solutions containing photosensitizers, i.e., multivitamins, amino acids, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of phototherapy, serious long-term effects have not been reported. However, there have been reports of phototherapy-induced DNA damage to human cell lines in vitro and bilirubin was found to enhance this damage (7,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%