2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.13179
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sphere Packing Bound for Vector Gaussian Fading Channels under Peak Amplitude Constraints

Abstract: An upper bound on the capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) Gaussian fading channels is derived under peak amplitude constraints. The upper bound is obtained borrowing concepts from convex geometry and it extends to MIMO channels notable results from the geometric analysis on the capacity of scalar Gaussian channels. Relying on a sphere packing argument and on the renowned Steiner's formula, the proposed upper bound depends on the intrinsic volumes of the constraint region, i.e., functionals defini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate the bounds for a random realization of H. If we consider the compound upper bound given by min C 2 , C PA,2 we see that, as predicted by Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, the capacity gap between upper and lower bounds is indeed vanishing both at high SNR, thanks to C PA,2 , and at low SNR, thanks to C 2 . Moreover, we compare the proposed bounds to the previous best in the existing literature, which we proposed in [14]. Specifically, let us denote by C SP the upper bound based on a sphere packing argument [14, Eq.…”
Section: A Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluate the bounds for a random realization of H. If we consider the compound upper bound given by min C 2 , C PA,2 we see that, as predicted by Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, the capacity gap between upper and lower bounds is indeed vanishing both at high SNR, thanks to C PA,2 , and at low SNR, thanks to C 2 . Moreover, we compare the proposed bounds to the previous best in the existing literature, which we proposed in [14]. Specifically, let us denote by C SP the upper bound based on a sphere packing argument [14, Eq.…”
Section: A Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1. To obtain a numerical result, each C i can be further upper-bounded with a suitable technique, like those presented in [8], [11], [14].…”
Section: A High Snr Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation