8th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks 2013
DOI: 10.1109/crowncom.2013.6636826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A split architecture for random access MAC for SDR platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System specification evolution requires BS platform flexibility. BS adaptability has progressed from softwarecontrolled hardware-defined radios (HW) [8], through accelerator-based GPP designs [9,10] to full software physical layer software-defined radio (SDR) implementations [8].…”
Section: Base Station Evolution Into C-ranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System specification evolution requires BS platform flexibility. BS adaptability has progressed from softwarecontrolled hardware-defined radios (HW) [8], through accelerator-based GPP designs [9,10] to full software physical layer software-defined radio (SDR) implementations [8].…”
Section: Base Station Evolution Into C-ranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar architectural design has been taken in [5] and the same concept has been generalized and then proved in an embedded platform. While the approach proposed in [2] and [5] provides a good trade-off between flexibility and achievable performance, the realization and any further adaptation of the time-critical functions still requires a high amount of low-level modification. In addition, this partition of MAC functionality between hardware and software makes the system architecture more complex and must be carefully planned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another approach, called split-functionality, has been developed by Nychis et al to move only the time-critical aspects, such as the Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) and the backoff mechanism, closer to the RF hardware [2]. A similar architectural design has been taken in [5] and the same concept has been generalized and then proved in an embedded platform. While the approach proposed in [2] and [5] provides a good trade-off between flexibility and achievable performance, the realization and any further adaptation of the time-critical functions still requires a high amount of low-level modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%