2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202510004635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Splitting Method for the Cahn–hilliard Equation With Inertial Term

Abstract: We prove that the semidiscrete solution converges weakly to the continuous solution as the discretization parameter tends to 0. We obtain optimal a priori error estimates, assuming enough regularity on the solution. We also show that the semidiscrete solution converges to an equilibrium as time goes to infinity and we give a simple finite difference version of the scheme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which has the advantage of splitting the fourth-order (in space) equation into a system of two second-order ones (see [16], [18] and [19]). Consequently, we use a P1-finite element for the space discretization, together with a semi-implicit Euler time discretization (i.e., implicit for the linear terms and explicit for the nonlinear ones).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which has the advantage of splitting the fourth-order (in space) equation into a system of two second-order ones (see [16], [18] and [19]). Consequently, we use a P1-finite element for the space discretization, together with a semi-implicit Euler time discretization (i.e., implicit for the linear terms and explicit for the nonlinear ones).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of this paper is to derive and analyze a second order (in time) fully discrete finite element scheme for the MPFC equation. For the space discretization we use a splitting approach which is well known in the context of phase field models (cf., e.g., [9,21]). This argument allows to consider low order (piecewise linear) finite elements, although the analysis is carried out in a more general setting, namely a Galerkin approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider here the scheme introduced in [79] (see also [50], [126] and [135]) which has the advantage of splitting the fourth-order equation into a system of two secondorder ones. Consequently, we use a P 1 -finite element for the space discretization, together with a semi-implicit Euler time discretization (i.e., implicit for the linear terms and explicit for the nonlinear ones).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cahn-Hilliard Equation 567 q [126], [134], [135], [136], [138], [139], [141], [142], [143], [144], [145], [146], [147], [152], [158], [191], [200], [201], [203], [208], [209], [211] and [217] for the numerical analysis and simulations of the Cahn-Hilliard equation (and several of its generalizations).…”
Section: Vol79 (2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%