2018
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2018.22.2865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A splitting theorem for the Seiberg-Witten invariant of a homology S1× S3

Abstract: We study the Seiberg-Witten invariant λSWpXq of smooth spin 4-manifolds X with rational homology of S 1ˆS3 defined by Mrowka, Ruberman, and Saveliev as a signed count of irreducible monopoles amended by an index-theoretic correction term. We prove a splitting formula for this invariant in terms of the Frøyshov invariant hpXq and a certain Lefschetz number in the reduced monopole Floer homology of Kronheimer and Mrowka. We apply this formula to obstruct existence of metrics of positive scalar curvature on certa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of Manolescu's result, it is also natural to ask this in the more restricted setting of having Rokhlin invariant one, in which case there is no 2-torsion. For further results in this direction, see work of Saveliev [24] and Lin-Ruberman-Saveliev [14].…”
Section: Overview and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In light of Manolescu's result, it is also natural to ask this in the more restricted setting of having Rokhlin invariant one, in which case there is no 2-torsion. For further results in this direction, see work of Saveliev [24] and Lin-Ruberman-Saveliev [14].…”
Section: Overview and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus all eigenvalues are real and non-negative. The proof of [18,Proposition 7.1] then proceed to show that spinors corresponding to small eigenvalues λ 2 of D − z (X T )D + z (X T ) are glued by spinors in the kernels of (D…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the construction in [1, p. 533], we get a family of metrics g ρ , ρ ∈ (0, r 0 ) for some small r 0 > 0, on the surgered manifold M ∞ by modifying g| N near a neighborhood of the surgery spheres. As explained in the proof of [18,Theorem 10.3], the proof of [1, Theorem 1.2] can be modified to this non-compact case so that for each fixed z 0 ∈ S 1 one can find ρ z0 > 0 such that for all ρ < ρ z0 we have…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the number − ind C D q − sign(M ) 8 always belongs to m(Y, s). Moreover, as we varies {c n }, this number changes by the spectral flow of / D q ,B0 .…”
Section: Consider the Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%