2016
DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sport Fitness Index for Assessment of Sport-Related Injury Risk

Abstract: Self-reported effects of previous injury may be one method to efficiently identify athletes who possess elevated injury risk, and subsequently deliver preventive interventions, thereby providing an alternative method to time-intensive functional testing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Institutional Review Board of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga approved all study procedures. Surveys administered prior to initiation of the first training session included the Sports Fitness Index (Wilkerson et al, 2016), the Overall Wellness Index (Wilkerson et al, 2021b), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (Edmed and Sullivan, 2012), which were used to confirm greater frequency of selfreported problems among the athletes who affirmed a history of at least one SRC (HxSRC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Institutional Review Board of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga approved all study procedures. Surveys administered prior to initiation of the first training session included the Sports Fitness Index (Wilkerson et al, 2016), the Overall Wellness Index (Wilkerson et al, 2021b), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (Edmed and Sullivan, 2012), which were used to confirm greater frequency of selfreported problems among the athletes who affirmed a history of at least one SRC (HxSRC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveys used were the Sport Fitness Index, 29 which contains questions about SRC Hx and MSK Hx, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale. 30 The athletes performed 60-second VMRT tests during which they manually contacted randomly illuminated buttons on a heightadjustable board (model D2 System; Dynavision International, West Chester, OH) and WBRA tests requiring lateral or diagonal movements in response to the appearance of visual targets on a virtual-reality display (model TRAZER Sports Stimulator; Traq Global Ltd, Westlake, OH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'At-risk' was defined as below a cutpoint for standing long jump (SLJ) and lower extremity functional test (LEFT) for lower quarter injuries and below a cut-point for SLJ, LEFT, and single hop for thigh and knee injuries. Future research should consider including the triple hop in test clusters to define 'at-risk' studentathletes combined with training factors known to be associated with injury including training load,(9,11) fitness, (39,40) for early identification for delivery and evaluation of injury prevention interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%