A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking

Roelofs, Ardi

doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f

Cited by 918 publications

(1,371 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,286

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…substructures [6,32]. Different subregions of the ACC Furthermore, Carter et al [7] observed a reduced blood appear to be involved with Stroop model of spoken word production [22,[39][40][41]. We report [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…Recently, a new account of the color-word Stroop phenomenon has been proposed based on an implemented model of spoken word production, WEAVER11 [22,[39][40][41]. On this account, Stroop effects arise from processing interactions among representations within the languageproduction architecture and task-relevant control achieved through explicit reference to goals, following Anderson [2], Levelt [21], and others.…”

Section: 3 the Weaver11 Model Of Stroop Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The du (duration) parameter is the latency of input control and critdiff (critical difference) is the response threshold in the model. The response latencies were derived as in earlier simulations of the model [39][40][41]. The left panel of Fig.…”

Section: 3 the Weaver11 Model Of Stroop Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following a long research tradition, we take the Stroop task to be a prototype of the willed control of language use. In Sections 2 and 3, we review some of the GRAIN [4] and WEAVER11 [22,[39][40][41]. We report processing the colors and words.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance

Roelofs

Hagoort

2002

Cognitive Brain Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The control of language use has in its simplest form perhaps been most intensively studied using the color-word Stroop task. The authors review chronometric and neuroimaging evidence on Stroop task performance to evaluate two prominent, implemented models of control in naming and reading: GRAIN and WEAVER11. Computer simulations are reported, which reveal that WEAVER11 offers a more satisfactory account of the data than GRAIN. In particular, we report WEAVER11 simulations of the BOLD response in anterior cingulate cortex during Stroop performance. Aspects of single-word production and perception in the Stroop task are discussed in relation to the wider problem of the control of language use. 

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: 3 the Weaver11 Model Of Stroop Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 3 the Weaver11 Model Of Stroop Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance

Roelofs

Hagoort

2002

Cognitive Brain Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In most models of speech production (e.g., Dell, 1986;Jescheniak & Levelt, 1994;Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999;Roelofs, 1992) lexical access is assumed to proceed in two steps. First, activation spreads from a conceptual representation (the lexical concept) to a semantically appropriate item in the lexicon.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The word frequency effect in picture naming: Contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures

Shatzman

Schiller

2004

Brain and Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Models of speech production disagree on whether or not homonyms have a shared word-form representation. To investigate this issue, a picture-naming experiment was carried out using Dutch homonyms of which both meanings could be presented as a picture. Naming latencies for the low-frequency meanings of homonyms were slower than for those of the high-frequency meanings. However, no frequency effect was found for control words, which matched the frequency of the homonymsÕ meanings. Subsequent control experiments indicated that the difference in naming latencies for the homonyms could be attributed to processes earlier than wordform retrieval. Specifically, it appears that low name agreement slowed down the naming of the low-frequency homonym pictures.

show abstract

Language

Saffran¹,

Schwartz²

2003

Handbook of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Language is a uniquely human capacity; hence the investigation of language function, as well as language‐brain relationships, requires the use of human subjects. In recent years, the development of methods for monitoring brain activity as people engage in cognitive tasks has provided a means of studying language‐brain relationships in normal individuals. These techniques complement the study of disruptions to language function caused by brain damage—the aphasias—which for some time served as the primary means of investigating the neural substrates of language. The breakdown patterns observed in aphasia are the focus of much of this chapter, which also reviews evidence from studies that examine language activity in the normal brain. The section on semantics describes how the understanding of objects and their names erodes in the condition known as semantic dementia. The section on language comprehension moves through the processing of spoken input from sounds to sentences. Finally, the section on production describes models of word retrieval and sentence production that aim to account for aphasic as well as nonaphasic performance. Within each section, evidence from functional imaging studies is considered alongside the lesion evidence.

show abstract

A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking

Cited by 918 publications

References 56 publications

Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance

Control of language use: cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance

The word frequency effect in picture naming: Contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures

Language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About