2021
DOI: 10.1108/jeee-03-2021-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A springboard for entrepreneurs? Gig and sharing economy and entrepreneurship in Russia

Abstract: Purpose The growing popularity of gig and sharing economy changes not only consumption models but also employment patterns. This study aims to analyze the potential entrepreneurial nature of gig and sharing economy initiatives. As such, the authors compare the entrepreneurial intentions of gig and sharing economy workers to the general population. Further, the authors consider commonalities and differences in terms of the driving forces of both intentions to start-up and participation in gig and sharing econom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the same approach in decomposing perceived behavioural control into its independent, but correlated, sub-dimensions. The literature on entrepreneurial behaviour shows the degree to which antecedents such as self-efficacy are important to attitude, the subjective norm and perceived behavioural control ( Hall and Krueger, 2018 ; Lortie and Castogiovanni, 2015 ; Mancha and Shankaranarayanan, 2020 ), while in the specific pro-PE context, Bogatyreva et al. (2021) found that self-efficacy is associated only with engagement with digital platforms.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We adopt the same approach in decomposing perceived behavioural control into its independent, but correlated, sub-dimensions. The literature on entrepreneurial behaviour shows the degree to which antecedents such as self-efficacy are important to attitude, the subjective norm and perceived behavioural control ( Hall and Krueger, 2018 ; Lortie and Castogiovanni, 2015 ; Mancha and Shankaranarayanan, 2020 ), while in the specific pro-PE context, Bogatyreva et al. (2021) found that self-efficacy is associated only with engagement with digital platforms.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On capital platforms, providers of physical assets are driven not only by economic but also social-hedonic motives involving subjective wellbeing ( Bucher et al., 2016 ). In the same vein, knowledge sharing and social capital creation have been traditionally reported as among the most important drivers of peer participation in the PE ( Bogatyreva et al., 2021 ; Frenken and Schor, 2019 ). For labour platforms, beyond the expectation of earning additional income, providers are also attracted by the level of income and greater flexibility in work ( Hall and Krueger, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%