2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stabilizing model-based predictive control algorithm for nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
170
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
170
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in which an irreversible exothermic reaction A −→ B occurs, which has been studied in [19,23,28]. At the feeding side the fresh feed of pure A is mixed with a recycle stream of unreacted A with recycle flow rate (1 − )q.…”
Section: The Cstr Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in which an irreversible exothermic reaction A −→ B occurs, which has been studied in [19,23,28]. At the feeding side the fresh feed of pure A is mixed with a recycle stream of unreacted A with recycle flow rate (1 − )q.…”
Section: The Cstr Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective is to regulate C A and T by manipulating T c . The nominal operating conditions, which correspond to the equilibrium C [19,23,28].…”
Section: The Cstr Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the inapplicability of infinite predictive horizon in real plants, a useful proposition originated from it makes great senses during the development of NMPC theory, i.e., a long enough predictive horizon can guarantee the closed loop stability for most systems (Costa & do Val, 2003;Primbs & Nevistic, 2000). Many existing NMPC algorithm is on the basis of this result, such as Chen & Allgower (1998), Magni et al (2001). Although long predictive horizon scheme is convenient to be realized, the difficulty to obtain the corresponding threshold value makes this scheme improper in many plants, especially in systems with complicated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular approach proposed by, e.g., Chen and Allgöwer [1998], Michalska and Mayne [1993] and Magni et al [2001], is to use a linear controller that is stabilizing the linearization of the system around the origin, to define terminal state constraint and cost. Another approach found in Primbs et al [1999] and Jadbabaie et al [2001] uses the theory of Control Lyapunov Functions to define an appropriate terminal cost function.…”
Section: Nonlinear Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%