1992
DOI: 10.1097/00042752-199210000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stabilometric Technique for Evaluation of Functional Instability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that stabilometry was a useful method for evaluating functional instability of the knee. 54 Tropp et al 84 reported that athletes who could not demonstrate postural balance within 2 standard deviations of normal had a significantly higher risk of lower extremity injury. Normal female subjects demonstrate greater single-limb postural stability than males on a stabilometer.…”
Section: Stage 1: Criteria For Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that stabilometry was a useful method for evaluating functional instability of the knee. 54 Tropp et al 84 reported that athletes who could not demonstrate postural balance within 2 standard deviations of normal had a significantly higher risk of lower extremity injury. Normal female subjects demonstrate greater single-limb postural stability than males on a stabilometer.…”
Section: Stage 1: Criteria For Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Many of the potential risk factors cannot be measured after ACL disruption, because the injury modifies the risk factors, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and bilateral asymmetry cannot always be assumed.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling and measuring multiple variables creates considerable challenges, as variables have the potential to interact with one another, and many of these variables are poorly defined or difficult to obtain reliably. 3 Many of the potential risk factors cannot be measured after ACL disruption, because the injury modifies the risk factors, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and bilateral asymmetry cannot always be assumed. 12,13 Because of these limitations, large prospective studies are recommended to identify ACL injury risk factors.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16,35,43 In the past, stabilometry studies were performed on a static force plate with measurement of center of pressure displacement in the sagittal and coronal planes. More recently, dynamic mobile platforms that also measure center of pressure displacement in 2 dimensions have been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,20,22,35,43,45 Assessment of change in postural stability and proprioceptive ability in these populations was quantified through the assessment of joint position sense, joint kinesthesia, and stabilometry, and has supported the role of postural stability training in the functional stability of the lower extremity following injury. 1,2,13,31,32,38,39 With respect to patients with mechanically stable knees following ACL reconstruction, proprioception and postural stability can improve over the first 9 to 12 months postoperatively as a result of rehabilitation focused on balance and proprioception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%