2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.04736
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stable and accurate scheme for solving the Stefan problem coupled with natural convection using the Immersed Boundary Smooth Extension method

Jinzi Mac Huang,
Michael J. Shelley,
David B. Stein

Abstract: The dissolution of solids has created spectacular geomorphologies ranging from centimeter-scale cave scallops to the kilometer-scale "stone forests" of China and Madagascar. Mathematically, dissolution processes are modeled by a Stefan problem, which describes how the motion of a phase-separating interface depends on local concentration gradients, coupled to a fluid flow. Simulating these problems is challenging, requiring the evolution of a free interface whose motion depends on the normal derivatives of an e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, level-set methods are quite straightforward to implement, versatile enough to be combined with another method and their advantages and drawbacks, linked to the mathematical properties of the equations at play, have been studied quite thoroughly. Solutions have been found for applying an immersed boundary condition using a finite-difference treatment for the variables, for instance the LS-STAG method [36], the Immersed Boundary Smooth Extension [37] or the Ghost Fluid method [38]. Note that all these methods can be shown to still rely on smooth approximations of Dirac/Heaviside functions [14], and are thus only first-order accurate spatially.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Existing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, level-set methods are quite straightforward to implement, versatile enough to be combined with another method and their advantages and drawbacks, linked to the mathematical properties of the equations at play, have been studied quite thoroughly. Solutions have been found for applying an immersed boundary condition using a finite-difference treatment for the variables, for instance the LS-STAG method [36], the Immersed Boundary Smooth Extension [37] or the Ghost Fluid method [38]. Note that all these methods can be shown to still rely on smooth approximations of Dirac/Heaviside functions [14], and are thus only first-order accurate spatially.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Existing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, level-set methods are quite straighforward to implement, versatile enough to be combined with another method and their advantages and drawbacks, linked to the mathematical properties of the equations at play, have been studied quite thoroughly. Solutions have been found for applying an immersed boundary condition using a finite-difference treatment for the variables, for instance the LS-STAG method [35], the Immersed Boundary Smooth Extension [36] or the Ghost Fluid method [37]. Note that all these methods can be shown to still rely on smooth approximations of Dirac/Heaviside functions [15], and are thus only first-order accurate spatially.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Existing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the phases is then determined by a single set of equations that apply over the entire domain. Many other methods also model phase changes, such as enthalpy methods [59,57], level set methods [47,15], diffuse-domain approaches [39,1], or some immersed-boundary methods [42]. Yet phase-field models stand out for combining several key benefits:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%