2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.13.499930
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stable, distributed code for cue value in mouse cortex during reward learning

Abstract: The ability to associate reward-predicting stimuli with adaptive behavior is frequently attributed to the prefrontal cortex, but the stimulus-specificity, spatial distribution, and stability of neural cue-reward associations are unresolved. We trained headfixed mice on an olfactory Pavlovian conditioning task and measured the coding properties of individual neurons across space (prefrontal, olfactory, and motor cortices) and time (multiple days). Neurons encoding cues and licks were most common in olfactory an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As HFA is highly correlated with fMRI BOLD signal (30,44), this observation directly implicates neuronal activity in choice, and helps bridge fMRI studies with animal studies that implicate SUA or MUA activity, which is also reflected in high-frequency LFP activity (24,42,44), in decision-making processes. Second, we demonstrate a highly distributed nature of human decision-making processes across regions, consistent with observations in animal models (6,7,50,53), while providing evidence for a more modular encoding of several decisionrelated variables such as risk (58), win probability (57) and motor activity(28) consistent with observations from non-invasive studies. Given their highly distributed nature, our sEEG recordings cover a wide number of areas and provide a more complete depiction of electrophysiological activity than in most animal model studies which are limited to a few areas (68,69).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As HFA is highly correlated with fMRI BOLD signal (30,44), this observation directly implicates neuronal activity in choice, and helps bridge fMRI studies with animal studies that implicate SUA or MUA activity, which is also reflected in high-frequency LFP activity (24,42,44), in decision-making processes. Second, we demonstrate a highly distributed nature of human decision-making processes across regions, consistent with observations in animal models (6,7,50,53), while providing evidence for a more modular encoding of several decisionrelated variables such as risk (58), win probability (57) and motor activity(28) consistent with observations from non-invasive studies. Given their highly distributed nature, our sEEG recordings cover a wide number of areas and provide a more complete depiction of electrophysiological activity than in most animal model studies which are limited to a few areas (68,69).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The ubiquity of choice-related L/HFA encoding across areas in our study is consistent with the view that value-based decision-making is a distributed process engaging multiple brain areas, likely simultaneously. The growing consensus on the existence of widespread brain activation for multiple cognitive processes including decision-making is supported by an increasing amount of evidence from primate single unit recordings(4, 5, 49-51), rodent (6,7), and human imaging studies (52). Our data support a distributed model of decision-making (50,53), which extends 'action-plan' models (54)(55)(56) by proposing that decision-making is a parallel, distributed process that weighs information across all representational levels, including those of good-based valuation and up until action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modular approach to understanding functional neuroanatomy has been challenged by a growing set of studies that highlight the broad distribution of variables otherwise thought to be more narrowly circumscribed. These include motor signals (Musall et al, 2019a and b; Stringer et al, 2019; Steinmetz et al, 2019) and reward signals (Vickery et al, 2011; Shin et al, 2021; Ottenheimer et al, 2022). These findings raise the possibility that like other cognitive functions, navigation may also be more distributed than previously assumed, perhaps as part of a gradient characterized by gradual untangling rather than strict functional borders (Fine et al, 2022; Fuster, 2000 and 2001; Yoo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data and code for this manuscript are publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.6686927 (Ottenheimer et al, 2022).…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%