2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stable, Perfectly Matched Layer for Linearized Euler Equations in Unsplit Physical Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
170
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
170
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The point source is implemented numerically as a Gaussian monopole of width w = ∆x + ∆y. A PML nonreflecting boundary [40] is applied at the bottom of the domain, and periodic boundary conditions connect the upstream and downstream ends of the domain at x = L ± . The impedance boundary condition is implemented by modifying the incoming characteristic at the boundary y = 0, as described in (11), with the velocity derivative ∂v ′ /∂t given by the modified boundary condition (9) and the mass-spring-damper modelled using (10); this requires storage of four extra quantities (v s , ξ, ν and η) at each location along the boundary.…”
Section: Test Case and Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The point source is implemented numerically as a Gaussian monopole of width w = ∆x + ∆y. A PML nonreflecting boundary [40] is applied at the bottom of the domain, and periodic boundary conditions connect the upstream and downstream ends of the domain at x = L ± . The impedance boundary condition is implemented by modifying the incoming characteristic at the boundary y = 0, as described in (11), with the velocity derivative ∂v ′ /∂t given by the modified boundary condition (9) and the mass-spring-damper modelled using (10); this requires storage of four extra quantities (v s , ξ, ν and η) at each location along the boundary.…”
Section: Test Case and Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small oscillatory point mass source of strength Q ′ = δ(x)δ(y +y s ) sin(ωt) generates small perturbations to this steady flow, and the wall at y = 0 responds as a mass-springdamper boundary governed by (2). The governing equations (19), together with a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) absorbing boundary [40] along the bottom boundary at y = −H, and the Myers (5) or modified (9) boundary conditions enforced in terms of characteristics (22) along the top boundary y = 0, lead to ∂q ∂t = −F x ∂q ∂x − F y ∂q ∂y − σ y q − σ y F x ∂q ∂x + H, …”
Section: Appendix B Details Of the Two-dimensional Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable PML formulation proposed by Hu [19] for a uniform flow is used here. The modified field equations in the PML regions are…”
Section: Perfectly Matched Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main categories for NRBCs, including characteristic boundary conditions (CBCs) [17,18], absorbing boundary condition based on the perfectly matched layer (PML) concept [19,20] and based on the sponge layer concept [21,22]. These types of boundary conditions are successfully implemented to have stable numerical computing and realistic results based on the Navier-Stokes equations [17,19,21] and LBM [18,20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%