2019
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201900575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stand‐Alone Module for Solar‐Driven H2 Production Coupled with Redox‐Mediated Sulfide Remediation

Abstract: Efficient electrochemical devices are required to convert electric power by intermittent renewable energy sources into a chemical form. The choice of combination in reduction–oxidation reactions can vary depending on the target, which provides different thermodynamics and kinetics. A promising approach for H2 production coupled with sulfide remediation is demonstrated to utilize the intermediate redox media. H2 is produced on the cathode, and soluble redox ions in a reduced form are oxidized on the anode. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential difference between the H 2 evolution reaction (HER) and sulfur oxidation reaction (SOR) is only 0.14 V (Kelsall and Thompson, 1993), substantially lower than the theoretical 1.23 V necessary to drive water splitting (Kay et al, 2006). However, the overall energy required to drive H 2 S splitting depends not only on its thermodynamics but also on the electrochemical setup, given that it is largely affected by the ohmic and mass transport losses as well as kinetic overpotentials on the electrocatalysts (Obata et al, 2019). Proper selection of the electrochemical conditions is a crucial step for optimizing the energy expenditure of the process.…”
Section: Electrochemical Separation Of H Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential difference between the H 2 evolution reaction (HER) and sulfur oxidation reaction (SOR) is only 0.14 V (Kelsall and Thompson, 1993), substantially lower than the theoretical 1.23 V necessary to drive water splitting (Kay et al, 2006). However, the overall energy required to drive H 2 S splitting depends not only on its thermodynamics but also on the electrochemical setup, given that it is largely affected by the ohmic and mass transport losses as well as kinetic overpotentials on the electrocatalysts (Obata et al, 2019). Proper selection of the electrochemical conditions is a crucial step for optimizing the energy expenditure of the process.…”
Section: Electrochemical Separation Of H Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (4) describes the voltage efficiency of an EC cell with a Faradaic efficiency of 100%, which is realistic for optimized experimental EC cells. [8,47,48] Although details of the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions during water splitting are still under debate, [2,49] we have assumed ΔE ¼ 1.23 V, which is widely used in the literature, [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][19][20][21][22][23][31][32][33][34][35][43][44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52][53][54][55] to calculate the EC voltage efficiency. In this section, we address the coupling and STH limit problems using the absolute currents of both PV and EC devices as well as the absolute total irradiance P in , which is practical if both devices have predefined areas.…”
Section: Power Coupling In the Pv-ec Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective permeability has been exploited to drive the photocatalytic degradation of harmful wastes (e.g. sulfide) 29 . Addition of Pt to chromium‐formed films is beneficial as an effective cocatalyst for photocatalytic water splitting 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sulfide). 29 Addition of Pt to chromium-formed films is beneficial as an effective cocatalyst for photocatalytic water splitting. 30 Therefore, understanding the role of MoO x H y films and of their synergy with CrO x H y on catalytic reactions has a wide range of implications for sustainable fuel generation and the remediation of wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%