1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90220-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the test involves a maximum performance, a shorter time to retest could result in influences from muscle stiffness or soreness as well as bias due to test-leaders remembering data. A number of three repetitions were chosen to avoid errors due to fatigue 1,21 . The time of rest between each effort within the test-series, was 10-20 seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the test involves a maximum performance, a shorter time to retest could result in influences from muscle stiffness or soreness as well as bias due to test-leaders remembering data. A number of three repetitions were chosen to avoid errors due to fatigue 1,21 . The time of rest between each effort within the test-series, was 10-20 seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One part of this score is a strength test, first described by Moseley 20 , measuring maximal isometric strength in 90° abduction. This part has been discussed and criticised for lacking standardisation 1,2,8 . Bankes et al 1 also raised the question about the technique used and recommended a "pull-force" with a fixed spring balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,25 Demographic data including age at the time of injury, sex, and concomitant injury patterns were also collected at the time of final follow-up. Constant scores were also measured as the percentage of the contralateral side because often scores represent little value in expressing functional outcome in those who were previously frail prior to their injury.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bankes et al [14] have described the fixed spring balance modification (fixed to a desk or to the floor) as a low-cost technique, which gave similar and equally reproducible values for power when compared with an electronic measuring device [15] . However, it does reliably detect improvements in shoulder function after intervention [16] .…”
Section: Constant Scorementioning
confidence: 99%