Context:Resistance exercise training commonly is performed against a constant external load (isotonic) or at a constant velocity (isokinetic). Researchers comparing the effectiveness of isotonic and isokinetic resistance-training protocols need to equalize the mechanical stimulus (work and velocity) applied.Objective: To examine whether the standardization protocol could be adjusted and applied to an eccentric training program.Design: Controlled laboratory study. Setting: Controlled research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-one sport science male students (age = 20.6 ± 1.5 years, height = 178.0 ± 4.0 cm, mass = 74.5 ± 9.1 kg).Intervention(s): Participants performed 9 weeks of isotonic (n = 11) or isokinetic (n = 10) eccentric training of knee extensors that was designed so they would perform the same amount of angular work at the same mean angular velocity.Main Outcome Measure(s): Angular work and angular velocity.
Results:The isotonic and isokinetic groups performed the same total amount of work (-185.2 ± 6.5 kJ and -184.4 ± 8.6 kJ, respectively) at the same angular velocity (21 ± 1°/s and 22°/s, respectively) with the same number of repetitions (8.0 and 8.0, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis showed that work (bias = 2.4%) and angular velocity (bias = 0.2%) were equalized over 9 weeks between the modes of training.Conclusions: The procedure developed allows angular work and velocity to be standardized over 9 weeks of isotonic and isokinetic eccentric training of the knee extensors. This method could be useful in future studies in which researchers compare neuromuscular adaptations induced by each type of training mode with respect to rehabilitating patients after musculoskeletal injury.Key Words: resistance exercise, muscle strength, knee extensors
Key Points• Equalizing mechanical stimuli through a method previously developed on concentric muscle loading can be applied successfully to the study of long-term isotonic and isokinetic eccentric resistance training. • This standardization procedure is valid and adaptable to progressive resistance exercise commonly used in strength training and rehabilitation.R esearchers have investigated many mechanical stimuli (eg, body weight movements, additional external load, constant velocity movements, elastic load) to increase muscle strength in healthy people or restore muscle function after injury. Most resistance-exercise training protocols induce muscle contractions against a constant external load (isotonic [IT]) or at a constant angular velocity (isokinetic [IK]).1 The IK exercise is used in rehabilitation because it provides a safer environment for training muscle after injury (eg, accommodating resistance, fixed velocity training). Rigorously comparing strength development that IT and IK modes induce could help clinicians who progressively use IT loading in rehabilitation programs. Isotonic exercise stresses the neuromuscular system mainly at the beginning and end of the muscle contraction because of the mechanical leverage points throughout th...