2012
DOI: 10.1177/0145445512448192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Standardized Method of Preventing and Managing Emergencies Within the Context of Evidence-Based Therapy Implementation

Abstract: Families served within child welfare settings evidence a wide range of emergencies or unexpected crises or circumstances that may lead to danger and make it difficult for them to focus on treatment planning. Mental health treatment providers are often unprepared to effectively manage emergencies during implementation of evidence-based prescribed therapy sessions. In this study, the authors empirically developed a standardized intervention to assist mental health providers in emergency prevention and management… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many of the separated children experienced instability in their living arrangements and emotional problems. Managing home adjustment issues is certainly appropriate within FBT, which incorporates specific intervention techniques to address common crisis situations and family emergencies as they arise (Urgelles, Donohue, Wilks, Van Hasselt, & Azrin, 2012). However, many of the emergency outcomes (e.g., domestic violence, eviction, financial need, no food) were not formally assessed in this study, supporting the need to develop outcome measures with real-world application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many of the separated children experienced instability in their living arrangements and emotional problems. Managing home adjustment issues is certainly appropriate within FBT, which incorporates specific intervention techniques to address common crisis situations and family emergencies as they arise (Urgelles, Donohue, Wilks, Van Hasselt, & Azrin, 2012). However, many of the emergency outcomes (e.g., domestic violence, eviction, financial need, no food) were not formally assessed in this study, supporting the need to develop outcome measures with real-world application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although family life educators could coordinate with trained professionals to use screening tools, Ager (2002) argued that objective assessments are less helpful than noting how individuals and families themselves understand and respond to emergencies and stressful situations. Urgelles, Donohue, Wilks, Van Hasselt, and Azrin (2012) also identified concerns that can arise when professionals use screening tools. In addition to the fact that the professionals using the tools may not be competent in meeting the needs identified by the tools, other skilled professionals who are competent may not be available for referral in a timely manner, and utilizing outside professional intervention does not prepare individuals and families to respond to situations themselves and learn to meet their own needs in the future.…”
Section: Current Situation: Topics and Best Practices Of Fle And Acutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Urgelles et al (2012) strategy was tested as a supplement with families facing emergencies while they were involved with a family behavior therapy program, but some of the aspects of the strategies could be useful for participants in FLE programming. First, the idea proposed both by Ager (2002) and Urgelles et al that the affected families should have an opportunity to determine their own priorities and needs is important and is consistent with the FLE principle of allowing participants to have a role in determining what is done in FLE (Myers‐Walls et al, 2011).…”
Section: Current Situation: Topics and Best Practices Of Fle And Acutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ELEs are common: in a community sample of youth, providers reported ELEs in 69% of clients and 8% of sessions, with a mean of 2.52 ELEs per treatment episode (Chorpita et al, 2014). Consistent with the nature of highly-stressed communities often served in community care (Southam-Gerow, Chorpita, Miller, & Gleacher, 2007; Urgelles, Donohue, Wilks, Hasselt, & Azrin, 2012), families with reported ELEs are significantly more likely to be low-income than those without ELEs (Guan et al, 2017a). The impact of stress on the mental health of low-income, urban youth has been widely documented; for instance, stressful life events significantly predict higher levels of aggression among youth (Attar, Guerra, & Tolan, 1994) as well as higher levels of depression and anxiety (Sheidow, Henry, Tolan, & Strachan, 2014).…”
Section: Emergent Life Eventsmentioning
confidence: 80%