2002
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/13.5.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-based model of sperm allocation in a group-breeding salamander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data indicate that females usually have more mating partners than do males and that sexual selection intensity in females rivals that of males. It is not clear if intrasexual competition and/or choice drive female sexual selection (as in males), but female mating preferences are no doubt intensified because male Ambystoma are sperm-limited (Harris and Lucas 2002). Levitan (1998) has argued that sexual selection should be intense but symmetrical in species where sperm are limiting, and the results from Ambystoma correspond perfectly to those predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data indicate that females usually have more mating partners than do males and that sexual selection intensity in females rivals that of males. It is not clear if intrasexual competition and/or choice drive female sexual selection (as in males), but female mating preferences are no doubt intensified because male Ambystoma are sperm-limited (Harris and Lucas 2002). Levitan (1998) has argued that sexual selection should be intense but symmetrical in species where sperm are limiting, and the results from Ambystoma correspond perfectly to those predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, reproduction in tiger salamanders is likely to be dictated by the order, quality, and/or quantity of spermatophores inducted. Annual sperm supplies are limited in Ambystomatid salamanders (Verrell et al 1986), and thus there is a trade off with regard to future matings (Harris and Lucas 2002). A male's mating success should be proportional to his sperm allocation relative to that of other males.…”
Section: Body Size and Reproductive Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from multiple regression analysis also indicated there was no relationship between ejaculatory expenditure and the body size of males in each strain (Table 3). Harris and Lucas (2002) predicted that investment in ejaculatory expenditure of males would change depending on sex ratio. In the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea, males dwelling not only with other males but also with females increased ejaculatory expenditure (Harris and Moore 2005).…”
Section: Hosken and Wardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these species, sexual selection intensities may still be high because of mate competition as opposed to mate choice. Furthermore, salamanders are unusual among vertebrates because male gametes (sperm) are packaged into relatively few spermatophores that are expensive to produce (Harris and Lucas 2002), which might be important in mating system evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Courtship is initiated by limited bouts of mutual nudging, which triggers males to deposit spermatophores. Typically, the number of spermatophores deposited ranges from 20 to 80 per breeding male (Garton 1972;McWilliams 1992;Harris and Lucas 2002). Apart from sperm capping (whereby spermatophores are placed directly on those previously deposited), there is limited evidence of interference (i.e., competition) among males courting females (Licht and Bogart 1990;Petranka 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%