2022
DOI: 10.1186/s43065-022-00058-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-of-the-art review of prestressed concrete tub girders for bridge structures

Abstract: This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of prestressed concrete tub girders for bridge structures, which are a resilient solution to reduce the occurrence probability of disruptive events and to extend the longevity of built-environments. Technical parameters are categorized in accordance with physical characteristics and corresponding contents are examined. Unlike the case of box girders, the open-section tub girders demand secondary structural elements to improve stability. As far as application is con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, due to economic considerations, state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) have shown a preference for reducing the number of girders. Consequently, the U-shaped prestressed girder has emerged as a viable alternative in this context [14]. The U-shaped viaduct has many advantages, such as the level of rail, which can be reduced due to the distance between the bottom of the flange and the rail, which results in savings in the foundation and station design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to economic considerations, state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) have shown a preference for reducing the number of girders. Consequently, the U-shaped prestressed girder has emerged as a viable alternative in this context [14]. The U-shaped viaduct has many advantages, such as the level of rail, which can be reduced due to the distance between the bottom of the flange and the rail, which results in savings in the foundation and station design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%