1998
DOI: 10.1080/002689798168448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-specific multi-reference coupled cluster formalism with molecular applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] To this same category belong several other MRCC approaches including methods based on the Jeziorski-Monkhorst ansatz 4 that have recently been thoroughly investigated. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, the ic-MRCC approach presents two major advantages over the Jeziorski-Monkhorst methods: (i) in applications based on a complete-active-space (CAS) reference, the energy is fully invariant with respect to separate rotations among core, active, and virtual orbitals, 14 and (ii) the computational and memory costs scale formally with a leading term of the same order as the one of single-reference coupled cluster theory. 15 Benchmark ic-MRCC computations at the singles and doubles level (ic-MRCCSD) demonstrate compaa) Electronic mail: francesco.evangelista@yale.edu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] To this same category belong several other MRCC approaches including methods based on the Jeziorski-Monkhorst ansatz 4 that have recently been thoroughly investigated. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, the ic-MRCC approach presents two major advantages over the Jeziorski-Monkhorst methods: (i) in applications based on a complete-active-space (CAS) reference, the energy is fully invariant with respect to separate rotations among core, active, and virtual orbitals, 14 and (ii) the computational and memory costs scale formally with a leading term of the same order as the one of single-reference coupled cluster theory. 15 Benchmark ic-MRCC computations at the singles and doubles level (ic-MRCCSD) demonstrate compaa) Electronic mail: francesco.evangelista@yale.edu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more demanding situations, when the single reference picture is no longer valid-a situation commonly identified with bond forming or bond breaking processes ͑resorting to more complicated state-universal or state-specific multireference CC approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] is then recommended͒, practically all MBPT driven approaches fail. While in the single reference framework, it turned out that more sophisticated methodologies going beyond the conventional MBPT need to be used with the purpose of overcoming these difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Attempts to fix this have led to the State-Specific (SS) MR-CC formulations, the BW [9] and Mk variant [10]. This in simplest terms is a kind of partitioning of the multi-state SU problem into trying to extract only one state at a time.…”
Section: New Philosophy For Mutlireference Coupled-cluster Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least a half-dozen serious attempts in this direction that go under names like Fock Space, valence universal (VU) [5,6], Hilbert space, state universal(SU) [7,8], Hilbert space state specific (SS) [9,10], etc. but all have formal and computational limitations.…”
Section: Nature Of Mupreference Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%