2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/saner.2015.7081856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A static code analysis tool for control system software

Abstract: Latent errors in control system software can be hard to detect through traditional testing techniques. Such errors, if left undetected, could manifest themselves as failures during run-time that could be potentially catastrophic and very expensive to fix. In this paper, we present a static code analysis approach to detect potential sources of such run-time errors during compile time itself, thus ensuring easy identification, safe execution and reducing the effort required during debugging.In order to detect ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other automatic modeling approaches, such as [85], target the conversion of software modules written in different languages to timed automata. A static code analysis tool is presented in [86] to parse and convert IEC 61131-3 control applications into control flow graphs. This model can then be assessed for type constraints, reachability, and liveness using a hybrid algorithm based on abstract interpretation and data flow analysis.…”
Section: Formal Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other automatic modeling approaches, such as [85], target the conversion of software modules written in different languages to timed automata. A static code analysis tool is presented in [86] to parse and convert IEC 61131-3 control applications into control flow graphs. This model can then be assessed for type constraints, reachability, and liveness using a hybrid algorithm based on abstract interpretation and data flow analysis.…”
Section: Formal Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%